George W. Bush

November 04, 2004

Dark Days Ahead

As promised below, here's the piece I wrote for The Nation magazine in my day-after exhaustion. The editors requested I look ahead, not behind. And I gazed into the dark future and concluded--guess what?--we're in for more of the same. (Didn't a certain presidential candidate warn of us of that?) Here it is. If you've seen it already, please scroll below or cruise through the comments for this and earlier postings.

Dark Days Ahead
by DAVID CORN
from the November 22, 2004 issue of The Nation

It's another four years--this time with a legitimate win behind him--and the prospects for George W. Bush's second term are grim. He is stronger politically; the Democratic opposition is weaker, especially in the Senate, where the Republicans gained several seats and closed in on a filibuster-proof super-majority. Bush and the GOP demonstrated that they could locate and mobilize their voters. The Democrats--even with big-money efforts (America Coming Together and its ad-buying sister outfit raised and spent more than $200 million)--could not match them. Bush now has more power than he did before the election. He will use it. And he is likely to adopt the game plan that served him well at the start of his first term: Move fast and move hard.

To what ends? Bush signaled his intentions before the election: partial privatization of Social Security, tax "reform" and tort "reform." And there is no reason not to take him at his word. On election night, Bush adviser Karen Hughes was talking about Social Security before the counting was done. "Ronald Reagan used his second term to justify nothing and to lay out an agenda for nothing," says Grover Norquist, a leading GOP activist/strategist. "Bush has already started laying out a vision of what he calls 'the ownership society.' It's a coherent worldview." It not only covers partial privatization of Social Security but the expansion of IRAs and health savings accounts. The point, says Norquist, is to wrap a Social Security initiative in a broader package with PR appeal. Norquist also envisions Bush pressing for a business-oriented tax cut before considering tax "reform." (Such a scheme will be billed as simplification, but it could also rejigger the tax code in favor of Bush's preferred beneficiaries: the rich.) And Bush will "shove" tort reform, Norquist says, "up the Democrats' backside."

The trend lines seem obvious. Bush can be expected to continue his undeclared war on environmental safeguards, to propose expanding the Patriot Act and to maintain his effective ban on stem-cell research. He has shown no willingness to reconsider decisions that have allowed various security needs--such as those at chemical plants and ports--to go unaddressed. He will further pursue policies that feed the gargantuan deficits and will deny the overwhelming fiscal fiasco. Before the election, his Administration was preparing for severe cuts in social programs. He may not take explicit steps to outlaw abortion. But he won't have to be explicit. It is inconceivable that Bush will not have the opportunity to appoint at least one Supreme Court Justice--William Rehnquist may provide the first vacancy--and he could get the chance to fill up to four openings. A Bush Court would be predisposed toward overturning Roe v. Wade. Presumably it would undermine environmental laws, be hostile to gay rights and put into action the goals of the right-wing "federalist" movement, which hails states' rights and property rights.

"On foreign policy, the big question mark," says Norquist, "is, What has the President and the Republican Party learned from Iraq? Did he learn it was a bridge too far and doesn't want to do three more of these? Or will he think, 'We got elected, let's do Egypt'?" Bush, Norquist adds, could end up at odds with conservatives on the "empire front." He observes, "If this is perpetual war to achieve perpetual peace, then it's out of sync with conservative members of Congress and his own base. They don't want a permanent garrison state with high taxes, a draft and a big government." But Bush has committed himself to "staying the course" (whatever it is) in Iraq and also to remaking the Middle East. He has fully embraced the hubris and arrogance of the neocons. Why should Bush change his fundamental national security views when he has escaped punishment for hyping a threat, misleading the country into an unnecessary war and alienating much of the globe?

The next four years could be dark ones. It is true that in recent decades second terms have been burdened by scandal (Watergate, Iran/contra, Monicagate). And the pattern could hold. Obstruction of justice in the Joe Wilson leak case? A Bush crony or relative caught profiting improperly in Iraq (Iraqgate)? And second-term administrations have often lost steam, as senior officials depart for high-paying private-sector jobs (while their White House connections are fresh) and are replaced by the B team. But Bush has often defied history: winning (sort of) in 2000 during a time of seeming prosperity and peace, protecting his party's position in Congress in mid-term elections and achieving re-election when the economy was down. History provides little comfort. And certainly the politics will be ugly. The Bush camp has been rewarded for its tactics of distortion and derision. Bush and Dick Cheney appealed to people's fears. And the lesson for them and the Republicans is clear: This worked, let's do more.

Who will lead the bloodied and weakened Democrats? Senate majority leader Tom Daschle was forcibly retired in South Dakota. Is there a successor who can do battle in the legislative mud pit and be a public force? Senator Hillary Clinton won't be vying for the job. It is a lousy launch pad for a presidential campaign. She, John Edwards, Howard Dean, Wesley Clark and others--Senator Joe Biden, Senator Evan Bayh, Al Gore, Governor Bill Richardson, Governor Tom Vilsack--will be busy jockeying for tactical advantage in 2008, as the progressive and centrist wings of the Democratic Party resume their ongoing brawl. Was Kerry too liberal? Was he too moderate? This debate has already begun.

But it was not just the Kerry campaign that fell short. The party professionals have much to answer for. The organizers did not churn out the necessary Democratic voters. The Dems in charge of Ohio misread the reality on the ground. Karl Rove, Bush's über-strategist, apparently succeeded in luring hordes of social conservatives to the polls in Ohio and elsewhere with anti-gay marriage initiatives. The so-called brains of the Democratic Party had no countervailing strategy.

There will be hard and dreadful days ahead for both the Democrats and the nation. The only good news is that the final tally--51 to 48 percent--demonstrates that there remains a great split in America. Praise that divide and prepare for the worst.
 

Posted by David Corn at 07:13 PM | Comments (41)

Coming Soon....

I've been decompressing. Haven't looked at the newspapers today. Haven't surfed. Have turned off the television. Instead, I applied for a new passport--just in case. (And that "just in case" is a joke.) And I took the kids to meet a friend and his family at the new National Museum of the American Indian. The displays certainly let you know that this country can make very big mistakes and not realize it--or deal with the consequences (moral and otherwise) of those sins--for years and years. I managed to catch a glimpse of Bush's press conference. (Q: How will you reach out to the other side, Mr. President? A: It's hard work, hard work.) But I made sure not to watch the whole thing. I'll check out the transcript. I couldn't help wondering why he didn't do such a long, open-ended session with reporters in the weeks before the election? It also caused me to ponder becoming a regular at White House press briefings. Should I be the new Helen Thomas? Helen after all, is still there. Let me know what you think. In any event, I'll be posting later today. I've been sitting on some interesting musings from a leading Republican about how GOPers may now feel freer to speak their minds about the mess in Iraq. Stay tuned. And, of course, visit the comments section and share what you're going through--and click on the ads to the right.

Posted by David Corn at 04:48 PM | Comments (53)

A Time To Heal? A "Mandate" from the People? Don't Buy the Pap

Two nations in one state--that is how it seems. So when Dick Cheney today exclaimed that he and George W. Bush have been handed a "mandate," he was once again engaging in blatant distortion. If you asked 100 people whether they wanted a beer that tastes great or one that is less filling and 51 chose the former and 48 went for the latter, no bartender would call that a "mandate" for the tasty brew. Bush and Cheney have done much to divide the body politic. Now they claim a "mandate" and profess a desire to unite the country. I was only able to observe a portion of Bush's speech this afternoon--I was, as the posting below notes, rushing to the warmth and comfort of home--but I did see him address John Kerry supporters and pledge to "work" to "deserve your trust." On CNN, Wolf Blitzer termed Bush's remarks "very gracious," and Judy Woodruff noted they would "go a long way to getting that [healing] under way." And I felt I was--or they were--in an alternative universe.

Does history not count? After winning the presidency in 2000 in a bitter and divisive contest, Bush pledged that he would reach out to the other side. He claimed he was a "uniter not a divider." He then did little to bridge the gulf. He appointed John Ashcroft--perhaps the most divisive member of the Senate at the time--attorney general. He forced his tax cuts package through without seeking any compromise with the Democrats. He ripped up the global warming treaty without offering any alternative--in essence telling the rest of the world to go take a hike. He assembled an energy task force that listened to corporate executives but did not hear out environmentalists, and he refused to say who was working with it. After 9/11, he campaigned against Democrats and claimed they did not care about the nation's security. And in the 2004 campaign, he repeatedly lied about Kerry, mischaracterizing his positions, distorting his words, assailing him as weak. And he stood by as his allies launched unsubstantiated attacks on Kerry's military service and character. That is how he won: by mocking Kerry and hurling false charges against him. And now he says he wants to win over Kerry's supporters?

It's a little late for that. My totally disillusioned, legal-alien wife just heard this particular Bush soundbite on the television and she angrily exclaimed, "Trust begins with the truth." She then clicked the remote and banished Bush from our presence. And she is right. (I'd be a fool to say anything else.) Bush had his chance. In fact, he had three chances. When he assumed the presidency, he could have made good on his promise. He did not. After 9/11, he had another opportunity, yet after a short interval he was back to the politics of fear, division and accusation. Then in this campaign, he could have endeavored to maintain a serious and somber discourse on the most pressing issues and challenges we face as a nation: the war in Iraq, the threat from al Qaeda and Islamic jihadism, the faltering economy. Instead, he resorted to cheap shots and disinformation (which I have chronicled extensively in items below).

So I beg to disagree with my pal Wolf. The time for graciousness is past. It's easy to be a gentleman after succeeding through down-and-dirty means. And, Judy, the words of a speechwriter are cheap. CNN White House correspondent John King reported that, yes, the president does know that the country was divided by this election, but he is "looking forward, not looking back." (Doing so, King informed us, is a "trademark of this president.") But that does not mean that we should. Bush has governed and campaigned in a divisive manner. A few sentences in a victory speech will not alter that. The slate is not wiped clean. Over 1100 Americans and thousands of Iraqis are still dead in Iraq for a war that was launched on the basis of untrue assertions. The tax burden still remains shifted toward the middle class. Bush's undeclared war on environmental protections still continues. He still supports amending the constitution to ban gay marriage. He still has in place a ban on effective stem cell research. He still has done nothing to remedy the gargantuan deficit.

Members of the Blue State Nation should not fall for let-bygones-be-bygones pap. Bush's phony vows are worth nothing. There is no mandate, there is no healing. There is a bitter fight over issues that matter greatly to the nation and the world. In his concession speech, Kerry said, "We're America, and America always moves forward." I have long liked Kerry (even though he can be rather frustrating as a politician), and I salute him for putting up a good fight. (There will be plenty of time to criticize his campaign.) But he is wrong on this point. Forward motion--progress, that is--is not guaranteed in America, or anywhere else. It only comes out of effort. A Supreme Court loaded with Bush appointees could quickly undo rights that were achieved over the course of years through hard work and struggle. America's standing in the world could--and probably will--continue to decline. The gap between the nation's well-off and poor has grown. Poverty rates have gone up in recent years. The number of Americans without health care coverage has increased. And there is no telling whether the United States is any safer today due to Bush's war in Iraq and his decisions regarding homeland security. It's arguable that the nation is less safe.

The country has not moved forward in the past four years, and it is unlikely to do so in the next four. In fact, the great divide in American politics that pundits often decry is a brake on policies that would take the country in the wrong direction. Bush opponents ought to not feel bad for resisting the can't-we-all-just-get-along urgings of commentator. Bush and Karl Rove declared war on Blue Staters; Blue Staters have the right--and obligation--to defend their land and fight back.

Posted by David Corn at 12:01 AM | Comments (201)

November 03, 2004

Live (Sort Of) From Boston, It's the Day After...and Time To Go Home

It's 1:30, the day after. Kerry just put off his concession speech a half hour. I am in the media filing center. It is mostly empty. One television is on. Wolf speaks. Most of the press has headed out to cover Kerry's farewell. (He does, though, remain a senator.) I have just filed a piece for The Nation magazine that goes to bed later today. The article looks at what to expect from the second-term. I'll put it up here when it is published. But you know the score: more of the same. There are dark days ahead. And those of us on the losing side of this great divide in America will have to build up our Blue State Nation. Something has to replace Red Sox Nation.

It will not be easy. The Dems are in a deep hole. There may be more of them than us (as voters) at this time. I'll have more to say and write on all this later. (Without reviewing the piece below, I stand by my preliminary, four-in-the-morning observations.) Right now I have one thought on my mind: get to the airport, get to my car, drive home, and see the wife and my wonderful daughters. I am lucky to have such consolation. It's not my ass in an unreinforced Humvee in Iraq. I'm not worried about losing childcare or school lunch subsidies for my family. I have a decent (if not great) health care plan. I'm not watching my job go overseas. (It's hard to outsource punditing.) I was able to marry the person I love. I will never need an abortion. You get the picture. Though I do work in a war zone of sorts--my office is on Capitol Hill and I must drive through two checkpoints a day to reach my parking space--others are more likely to pay for Bush's sins than me. But we all live in Bushworld--as do citizens around the globe--and we must bear the consequences of the decision made by those on the other side of our national divide. Fortify yourselves however best you can. (I notice many of this blog's commenters fancy the power of a good, stiff drink. Have one on me.) And I'll be posting again shortly. Now it's time to dash home....And please click on the new Amnesty International ad to the right and let them know you're still engaged and part of the fight. Onward.

Posted by David Corn at 01:46 PM | Comments (204)

Bush Wins (Or Seems To)--Let the Great American Divide Continue!

Below is the "Capital Games" column I posted on www.thenation.com on the election at 4:00 in the morning. If you've seen it already, please scroll down to see other items.

BUSH WINS (OR SEEMS TO)
LET THE GREAT AMERICAN DIVIDE CONTINUE
11/03/04

By DAVID CORN
It's 3:30 AM. Ohio looks bad for John Kerry. He's down 180,000 votes. There may be 175,000 provisional ballots. But can Kerry win practically every single one and find other votes there? Kerry is losing by 1700 votes in New Mexico and 15,000 in Iowa. John Edwards appeared before Kerry supporters in Copley Square and promised that the Kerry campaign will fight to count every vote. But the Kerry ticket is behind in the national numbers, on the short end of a 51-48 split, trailing Bush by almost 4 million votes, with 93 percent of the precincts reporting. The election was close, achingly close. There may be an odd bounce or two yet to come. But the safe assumption is that George W. Bush will emerge the winner of the electoral vote and the popular vote. It's a sad morning in America.

The electorate almost engaged in a much-needed political correction. It almost undid the asterisk of 2000. Instead, voters legitimized the fellow who gained the White House against the will of the majority and who then pretended he had a mandate and subsequently pushed tax cuts for the well-to-do and launched a war predicated on untrue assertions. So there will be no good-bye to reckless preemptive war, an economic policy based on tax breaks tilted toward the wealthy, a war on environmental regulations, a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, excessive secrecy in government, unilateral machismo, the neocon theology of hubris and arrogance, a ban on effective stem cell research, no-bid Halliburton contracts, John Ashcroft, Donald Rumsfeld, and much more. Did I mention Dick Cheney?

Bush lied his way into office and lied his way through his presidency. His reelection campaign was based on derision and disingenuousness; he mischaracterized Kerry and his positions and touted successes that did not exist. And now, it seems, he got away with it. He was not punished for leading the country into a war that was not necessary. He was not booted for having overstated the WMD threat from Iraq. He paid no price for failing to plan adequately for the post-invasion period. Iraq remains his mess. And the United States and the world remains at the mercy of a gang that, no doubt, will feel even more emboldened to pursue their misguided policies.

The good news: America is a divided nation. Despite the pundit hand-wringing over this fact, it is a positive thing. Nearly-- nearly--half of the electorate rejected Bush's leadership, his agenda, his priorities, his falsehoods. From Eminem to the chairman of Bank of America to 48 Nobel laureates to gangbangers who joined anti-Bush get-out-the-vote efforts in swing states. Nearly half of the voting public concluded that Bush had caused the deaths of over 1100 American GIs and literally countless Iraqis (maybe 100,000) for no compelling reason. Nearly half saw the emperor buck naked and butt ugly. Nearly half said no to his rash actions and dishonest justifications. Nearly half realized that Bush had misrepresented the war in Iraq as a crucial part of the effort against al Qaeda and Islamic jihadism. Nearly half desired better and more honest leadership. Nearly half knew that Bush has led the country astray.

Other good news: Second-term presidents often hit the skids. The last three second- terms were marked by scandal (Watergate, Iran-contra, Monicagate). And as top officials sprint through the revolving door to snag high-paying jobs (while their contacts are fresh), the job of running the government during the second administration often falls to the B Team. In the post-9/11 world, this is not all that reassuring. But the historical trend does suggest that Bush will have trouble enacting his various schemes. Yet--let's be realistic--the Senate results indicate that the GOP will expand its majority in the Senate, which means Bush will have more allies for his wrongheaded missions.

More good news; Bush will not be able to hand off his own wreckage--Iraq and the gargantuan deficit--to a new man. But this does not mean he will accept responsibility and deal with it. Bush has the ability to deny and defy reality. And if he cannot see that the trash has piled up, he will not be hauling it to the curb.

Okay, no more good news. I can't stand all this good news. Bush has bamboozled and frightened just enough Americans to gain the opportunity to flimflam them for another four years. And the rest of the country--and the globe--will be along for the dangerous ride.

As for John Kerry, he and his advisers loed like geniuses early on Election Day, when exit polls showed him ahead in the critical states There will be time--plenty of time--to critique Kerry and his crew and second-guess their various decisions. Had he swatted down the Swift Vets earlier would that have saved him just the right number of votes? Had he voted against granting Bush the authorization to launch an elective war against Iraq anytime Bush damn well pleased, perhaps Kerry would have presented a clearer picture for the electorate and inoculated himself from the trumped-up flip-flop charge. Perhaps. He, too, will have years to ponder all of this.

Kerry was no top-gun campaigner. His rhetoric often meandered. More than once he shot himself in the foot with inartful language. But he did vigorously criticize Bush for misleading the country into war and for screwing up (big time!) the planning for the post-invasion period. He called for expanding health care coverage and for dramatic investments in alternative energy. He slammed Bush for ignoring the middle class crisis. He advocated raising the minimum wage and vowed to take on such special interests as the prescription drugs lobby. He excoriated Bush's assault on environmental safeguards and defended abortion rights. And he effectively used the three debates to counter the Bush camp's claim that he was a finger-in-the-wind pol and a weak-kneed opportunist with no convictions. Those encounters hurt Bush. Of those voters who say they decided in the past month, Kerry led 60 to 37 percent. All of this--it almost worked.

There was a clear difference between the two candidates. They disagreed on many basic issues. But--perhaps more importantly--they represented vastly different ways of engaging the world. One has adopted an ask-no-questions, nevermind-the- nuances, don't-look-back, tough-guy style of leadership. The other promised to consider and reach out before leaping. One said--practically boasted--that he read no newspapers. The other came across as a man who absorbed much information before rendering a decision. The voters chose the wrong man.

But not all is lost. The Red-Blue battle--a war of culture, ideology, politics and psychology--will not end with the final tally in Ohio. The forces of Bushism appear to have triumphed this day. But life--if we are lucky--is long, and history never ends. Let the great divide in America continue.

Posted by David Corn at 04:09 AM | Comments (171)

Live From Boston, It's Election Day: Part Seven--The End?

This site is under construction....Just kidding. Sorry, it's late and I am depressed....The numbers do not look favorable for Kerry. John Edwards just came out and told the folks who have been waiting in Copley Square that the Kerry campaign will make sure that "every vote will count" and that it "will fight for every vote." Then he left--without a goodbye. But the Ohio results are increasingly lousy for Kerry. It appears that Bush will end up with a 150,000 or so lead there. Can there be enough provisional ballots for Kerry to overcome that? New Mexico is trending toward Bush. And there are 1.6 million absentee ballots in Florida, but the gap in that state is 350,000. Can Kerry win almost two-thirds of those absentee ballots? In the national count, Kerry is down 3.5 million, with 90 percent of the vote in. He's on the wrong end of a 51-48 split. (Looks like Ralph Nader for the moment escapes the spoiler charge.) There is much for Kerry to surmount. Color me a pessimist.

In the media center, reporters mill about and wonder if any of the Kerry aides will come by to tell us what to do. (Last time Joe Lockhart and Mike McCurry briefed us, they looked not too happy. And when I pointed out the daunting math in Ohio, Lockhart had no real response.) This reminds me of four years ago. I was in Austin, and journalists waited until 4:00 in morning for Bush spinners to appear and say what was--or what was not--going on. We were like school kids without a teacher. When no one showed, we shrugged our shoulders and went home. People are packing now. I've written two versions of an article. But I have not posted either. Joe Lockhart, Mike McCurry, where are you?....Stay tuned. Or, rather, go to sleep. If there is any news tonight, it will likely not be good news.

Posted by David Corn at 02:34 AM | Comments (11)

Live From Boston, It's Election Day: Part Six--Fear in McAuliffe's Eyes

Abandon hope? Democratic Party chairman Terry McAuliffe came through the media room a little while back. I thought I saw fear--or worry--in his sharp eyes. Ohio, Ohio, Ohio--that's what he and Michael McCurry keep telling us. As goes Ohio....But right now, Bush is leading in that state--up by nearly 200,000 voters, with 68 percent of the precincts reporting. I just went to the Ohio state website and looked at the county list. There still are some big Democratic counties that have not fully reported, such as Cuyahoga (Cleveland). But there also are a fair number of smaller counties that are trending Republican that have not fully reported. It doesn't look like it will be easy for Kerry to close the gap in Ohio. Possible, but....Oh, shit.

wage slave journal

 

 

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter:

Home
Archives
Comic strip
Contact

Support the Wage Slave Journal
Tip Jar
WSJ store

Features covering George W. Bush's evils:

24 February 2003
Bush's shameful post-9/11 legacy
How does President Bush's record compare with what we would expect from a great president?

28 February 2002
Mangling the language
How Bush misuses words to wrap unpalatable policies in popular rhetoric.

13 January 2002
Clip 'n save guide to the Enron scandal
Everything you need to know for a basic understanding of just what went wrong with Enron--and how the Bush administration is involved.

21 November 2001
The beginning of the end for the Constitution?
Some of President Bush's latest actions post a real threat to the freedom we all enjoy.

12 September 2001
On standing behind the president
We shouldn't suspend criticism of the president simply because of a crisis.

21 May 2001
Bush's energy ploy
Bush's energy policy is little more than a fraud--and so is the crisis it's supposed to fix.

30 April 2001
The dirt on Florida
A review of Down and Dirty: The Plot to Steal the Presidency and interview with author Jake Tapper.

27 February 2001
Lending the rich a helping hand
Bush's $1.6 trillion tax cut is a boon to the wealthy but misses millions of the working poor.

8 November-13 December 2000
The Florida debacle
The Wage Slave Journal on thirty-six days of unforgettable American history.

3-17 October 2000
Special report: the debates
Blow-by-blow analysis of the four presidential and vice-presidential debates.

30 June 2000
Answer me!
Asking the presidential candidates questions they'd never answer.

4 February 2000
George W. Bush: thoughtless candidate for an unthinking America
How can Bush garner so much support with so little to offer?

20 December 1999
Presidential unqualifications
Which candidate for president is the worst?

8 October 1999
Selling futures
On G.W. Bush's proposal to strip failing public schools of funding.

Complete archives

George W. Bush Scorecard of Evil

Yes, the Scorecard is now retired. With the election coming up quickly, I'm working full time at getting John Kerry elected. Even though I'm ending the entries with October 2003, it's still a good record of what this administration has done to this country, and I hope you'll send it around to your friends.

Thanks for all the encouraging emails, including those speculating that I had been kidnapped by blackbooted thugs in the Bush administration. I've created a printer-friendly version of the Scorecard in response to the many requests.

Questions? Comments? Don't hesitate to send me an email.

Planning on writing some hate mail? Read this first!

 

January-June 2001 July-December 2001 January-June 2002 July-December 2002 January-June 2003 July-December 2003 January-June 2004 July-December 2004
Evil index Evil act Evil details
10-20-2003

USA Today

Bush pleads with China and Japan to save him from his economic failures. Bush likes to say that his enormous tax cuts that give hundreds of billions of dollars to America's wealthiest people are job-creation programs. But America has bled millions of jobs since Bush's tax cuts became law, so it's time to try something new. Bush's new tactic? Beg China and Japan to increase the value of their currencies, which will make American manufacturers more competitive. But Bush has nothing to offer in return -- and has done little to make other countries inclined to offer him favors. Instead of making pointless pleas to other countries, maybe Bush should come up with an economic plan that would actually create jobs instead of just putting more money in the pockets of those who need it least.
10-15-2003

Washington Post

Bush uses EPA funds to make campaign ads. Well, the EPA probably has a lot of money sitting around, what with it not enforcing environmental regulations anymore. So why not spend some of that dough getting President Bush reelected? The EPA runs Spanish-language ads on radio touting the Bush environmental policies that destroy the environment.
10-15-2003

CBS

Bush misrepresents evidence on Iraq to the United Nations. Colin Powell's speech to the United Nations was a watershed moment in the run-up to the Iraq war. Powell's reputation as a moderate and credible voice made the evidence he presented about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction seem that much more impressive. But as State Department employee Greg Thielmann reveals, it was nothing but twisted and misleading evidence, trumped up to sell Bush's Iraq war.
10-11-2003

Washington Post

Bush proposes loosening protections of endangered species. Sure, species extinction is a bad thing, but is it as bad as, say, not having a wastebasket made out of real ivory? That's the position of the Bush administration, anyway, which lifts restrictions on killing and trading endangered species. But at least it's only foreign animals. Who cares about those animals in other countries?
10-10-2003

Associated Press

Bush overturns limits on mining waste sites. In another victory for the mining industry, which has been as generous to President Bush as a donor as he has been to it as a president, the Interior Department overturns a rule put in place by the Clinton administration that limited the land mining sites could use to dispose of waste.
10-8-2003

CNN

Bush starts new public relations campaign on Iraq. Faced with failure, effective leaders change policy. Ineffective leaders figure out new way to sell their current policies. President Bush chooses to do the latter in Iraq, creating a new public relations push to make people feel better about the soldier-per-day death rate since Bush declared "Mission Accomplished."
10-3-2003

White House Proclamation

Bush declares Marriage Protection Week. Is the institution of marriage in danger? Because as far as I can tell, people are still getting married. But President Bush apparently thinks marriage is in dire need of protection, and hops into action by declaring "Marriage Protection Week." Bush, of course, thinks that marriage needs protection from gay couples, who want to attack marriage by, uh, getting married. I'm not quite sure how that works, but Bush must know what he's doing, right?
10-1-2003

CNN

Bush does nothing to reveal who disclosed Valerie Plame's identity. The White House likes to tout President Bush as a "strong leader." If there's even a modicum of truth to that, Bush already knows who leaked Valerie Plame's identity as an undercover CIA agent. But when asked, he refuses to do anything to reveal the truth, instead just claiming, "I want to know the truth," and passing the buck (as usual) to the Justice Department.
9-28-2003

Washington Post

Bush discloses undercover CIA agent's identity as retribution against her husband. When Joseph Wilson revealed that the Bush administration had used false intelligence to justify the war in Iraq, a smear campaign against him was predictable. But it was impossible to predict that the White House would reveal that Wilson's wife was an undercover CIA agent who worked on weapons of mass destruction -- supposedly the reason we went to war in the first place -- just to get back at Wilson.
9-24-2003

New York Times

Bush tells Congress not to offer a Medicare prescription drug benefit to the poor. Traditionally, Medicare benefits go to all Medicare recipients. But President Bush wants millions of low-income seniors to lose out on any new prescription drug benefit. He would rather those seniors rely on the states' Medicaid benefits, which vary from state to state (and year to year) and worsen the states' already severe fiscal crises -- which Bush has made worse with his enormous tax cuts.
9-23-2003

Washington Post

Bush takes away the discretion of career prosecutors. Conservative politicians like to reduce law enforcement to simple "tough on crime" platitudes. But the actual enforcement of law and prosecution of crime can't be reduced to simple black-and-white thinking. That's why prosecutors ought to have discretion over charges they file. But Attorney General John Ashcroft issues new guidelines forcing federal prosecutors to file the most serious charges possible in every case, because that "tough on crime" stance still looks great in the papers.
9-22-2003

Associated Press

Bush gives federal funds to religious groups. President Bush continues his efforts to chip away at the wall between church and state by issuing new regulations that allow new federal funds to go religious groups. But this is about more than church-state separation. It's also about Bush's attempt to move the federal government out of the business of helping people.
9-21-2003

The Observer

Bush tries to cover up global warming. Seriously, can we just stop it with the global warming denial already? I know it's inconvenient for conservative ideologues, but facts are facts. Actually, facts aren't facts if you work for the Bush administration, because facts can always be covered up. And when it comes to global warming, that's just what this administration does.
9-17-2003

Washington Post

Bush continues to hide energy task force proceedings. Back in 2001, the administration released an energy policy that was filled with gifts to President Bush and Vice President Cheney's friends in the energy industry. So it would hardly be surprising to find out that the energy industry dominated the meetings at which the policy was written. But Cheney goes to the Supreme Court to try and keep records of his energy task force's meetings secret, simply because of the administration's distaste for open government.
9-16-2003

New York Times

Bush attacks librarians for opposing the Patriot Act. Librarians have criticized the Patriot Act because it allows the federal government to invade the privacy of library patrons. And how does the Bush administration respond? "Mr. Ashcroft mocked and condemned the American Library Association and other Justice Department critics for believing that the F.B.I. wants to know 'how far you have gotten on the latest Tom Clancy novel.'" Silly people who want to protect civil liberties! Don't you have something more important to do, like celebrating "Patriots' Day"?
9-11-2003

Washington Post

Bush uses the September 11 attacks to justify all his policies. Why should we pass tax cuts for the rich? The September 11 attacks. Why should we clear cut forests and let polluters write environmental policy? The September 11 attacks. Why has America lost millions of jobs since Bush took office? The September 11 attacks. Next thing you know, he'll be saying we went to war with Iraq because of the September 11 attacks! Nah, he wouldn't go that far...
9-11-2003

Washington Post

Bush tries to expand the Patriot Act. President Bush celebrates the second anniversary of the September 11 attacks by calling for an expansion of the Patriot Act, which restricts civil liberties in the name of security. But at least he renames the day "Patriots' Day," so we all know that we're bad Americans for valuing our freedom.
9-10-2003

Agence France-Presse

Bush tries to expand the death penalty. This really speaks for itself. In a time when the death penalty ought to be shrinking into nonexistence what with dozens of innocent people being discovered on death row, President Bush pushes for an expansion of the death penalty, saying the current law is one of the "unreasonable obstacles" to fighting terrorism.
9-1-2003

USA Today

Bush allows the sale of PCB-polluted lands. Remember when EPA stood for Environmental Protection Agency? President Bush's EPA -- who knows what the hell it stands for under that guy -- reverses a 25-year policy of not selling lands polluted by PCBs. The bans prevented people from spreading the pollution until the EPA could ensure the lands were clean. Not any more.
8-29-2003

Associated Press

Bush expands global abortion gag rules. One of Bush's first acts in office (see 1-21-2001 below) was to limit funding to international organizations that provide abortions. Now he expands that rule so that no federal funds can go to international organizations that provide any abortions, even with their own funds. The result, of course, is devastating for the health of the world's poorest women.
8-29-2003

Washington Post

Bush chooses not to regulate auto emissions. It isn't often that government agencies choose to limit their own power, but President Bush's EPA is a notable exception. The agency announces that it conveniently doesn't have the power to regulate auto emissions, providing another big win for the auto industry. The reason? The EPA claims carbon dioxide isn't a pollutant. Which is true, if you don't believe in global warming. (See 9-21-2003, above.)
8-29-2003

Associated Press

Bush cuts Energy Star program. President Bush likes to praise programs in front of the camera and then slash them when the camera is turned off. One good example is the Energy Star program, which Bush touts (correctly) as an effective environmental program, providing $70 in benefits for every one dollar spent. But the EPA shifts funds so that the Energy Star program doesn't get the funds Congress intended for it to get. When Bush praises a program, watch out -- it maybe destined for big cuts.
8-28-2003

Washington Post

Bush awards no-bid contracts to Halliburton. Look, Halliburton may be the best company to provide contracting services in Iraq. It may not be. But one thing is certain: it looks awfully suspicious for the Bush administration to award a no-bid contract to Halliburton when Vice President Cheney used to be the company's CEO. What's more, it completely contradicts the White House's professed distaste for government interference in a free market. A bidding process would drive down the costs for the taxpayer and guarantee improved services. But it would mean smaller profits for Cheney's old firm.
8-27-2003

Associated Press

Bush cites war on terror as reason for small federal pay raise. Justifying a miserly 2 percent raise for federal workers, Bush says that a higher raise would harm our ability to prosecute the war on terror. So he does realize that we need money to win the war on terror. But he hasn't realized that his multi-trillion-dollar tax cuts do much, much, much more to destroy the nation's financial health than a decent raise for those who work for the government.
8-23-2003

Washington Post

Bush relaxes clean air rules. We have to be honest with you: we thought this was a done deal back in November 2002. (See 11-22-2002 below.) But apparently the EPA is now getting around to implementing the rules that will gut the Clean Air Act. Under the new Bush rules, older power plants will be able to expand their operations without installing new anti-pollution technology. But why should Bush care? Prevailing wind patterns push all that pollution toward the northeast, and those states didn't vote for him anyway.
8-22-2003

Associated Press

Bush lies about air quality after September 11 attacks. There's nothing funny about this at all. After the September 11 attacks, the EPA told New Yorkers it was safe to live and work near Ground Zero. It turns out that under White House pressure, the EPA lied about the data it had and omitted important information about the quality of the air and what New Yorkers needed to do to stay healthy. It may take years to see the effects -- possibly birth defects or increased cancer rates -- of what may be Bush's worst lie yet.
8-18-2003

Time

Bush defunds Teach for America. If you run a nonprofit organization, beware the photo-op with George W. Bush. It's like the kiss of death: it may seem friendly at the time, but you'll learn to regret it later. While those who run Teach for America were optimistic after meeting Bush the presidential candidate, they found their funding taken away under Bush the president. Now the program, which gives top students money for college for teaching in underprivileged communities, has to eliminate scholarships.
8-17-2003

Washington Post

Bush blocks plan to upgrade nation's power grid. You would think that in the wake of an enormous power outage that paralyzed much of the northeast United States and southeast Canada, it wouldn't be difficult to unite behind a plan to upgrade the power grid. But President Bush opposes his own handpicked chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and sides with (surprise, surprise) the energy industry to oppose the plan. Instead, the administration thinks that more deregulation is the solution, even though deregulation is largely the problem in the first place. A deregulated power industry has no financial incentive to pay the costs of upgrading the grid. Apparently, Bush hasn't quite learned the lessons from Enron that he needs to learn yet.
8-14-2003

San Francisco Chronicle

Bush cuts pay for soldiers in Iraq. "And tonight, I have a special word ... for all the men and women who wear the uniform of the United States: America is grateful for a job well done," said President Bush as he declared an end to fighting "major" combat operations in Iraq. Bush has a funny way of showing he's grateful. Under Bush, the Pentagon cuts imminent danger pay as soldiers die every day in Iraq and family separation pay as soldiers are separated from their families for months.
8-12-2003

New York Daily News

Bush uses the IRS and federal funds to send out a campaign letter -- again. Just as with his enormous tax cut in 2001 (see 6-22-2001 below), President Bush is spending millions of taxpayer dollars to send a letter to folks letting them know about the rebate checks they'll receive in the mail. The purpose of the letter is nothing more than to associate Bush's name with the checks, providing a little campaign boost for the president's reelection.
8-11-2003

Associated Press

Bush pushes plan to make it easier for timber companies to plunder national forests. Just as President Bush fights the freedom-hating terrorists by taking away our freedoms, so he fights tree-burning forest fires by selling off the trees. (See 8-21-2002 below.) On a break from his annual month-long vacation, Bush takes the opportunity to promote his tree-destroying program and pretend to be an environmentalist.
8-9-2003

New York Times

Bush proposes eliminating protections for historical sites from highway projects. Another no-brainer that's no-brained by the Bush administration. Of course protecting historical sites should be of vital importance when you're deciding where to put a major interstate. And those protections are written into federal law. But if the Bush administration has its way, they'll be taken out, opening all kinds of historical sites to desecration and even destruction.
8-7-2003

LA Times

Bush gives oil companies in Iraq blanket immunity from lawsuits. Whether you think Iraq's oil was a small factor in the decision to go to war or the main reason, you cannot deny the potential that some of the companies given contracts to deal with the oil in post-Saddam Iraq may abuse their new privileges. After all, any company can abuse any contract. But Bush ensures that oil companies can engage in all the abuse they want with an executive order that gives them blanket immunity from lawsuits.
8-7-2003

Washington Post

Bush seeks retribution for judges who use their discretion in sentencing. Laws that restrict the ability of judges to use their discretion when sentencing criminals can be the source of grave miscarriages of justice. Attorney General John Ashcroft wants to make sure those miscarriages happens as often as possible, so he has asked federal prosecutors to report any instances of judges imposing more lenient sentences than the law allows. The law is a blunt instrument, and discretion in sentencing allows judges to take appropriate action based on mitigating circumstances. Is it any surprise that Ashcroft doesn't approve?
8-6-2003

New York Times

Bush proposes cuts to Medicare funding for cancer drugs. Cutting government healthcare costs is a good goal. When it involves cutting services for cancer patients, you'd hope the compassionate would rule out the conservative. But not for the Bush administration, as the Department of Health and Human Services proposes cutting the amount of money the government spends on cancer drugs. The administration says we overpay, but patient advocates say "instead of expanding access to lifesaving drugs, [the cuts] would limit access to cancer treatments for some of the most seriously ill Medicare beneficiaries."
7-31-2003

CBS News

Bush promotes a federal ban on gay marriage. Conservatives believe that gay people getting married somehow threatens heterosexual marriages. (They never seem particularly clear on how that works.) President Bush believes that an unsatisfied conservative base somehow threatens his reelection chances. (It's pretty clear how that works.) The solution is clear. Bush attacks gay marriage, suggesting that his administration is working on a way to make it illegal everywhere in the country. His attack comes at the expense of equality and dignity for homosexuals, values that Bush has never seemed to hold in high regard.
7-31-2003

Guardian

Bush shuts down nuclear weapons advisory panel. President Bush has been pushing for new kinds of nuclear weapons (see 7-6-2003 below), and there's nothing more inconvenient for that kind of goal than independent oversight. So the Bush administration eliminates the independent advisory board to the National Nuclear Security Administration. Members of the committee had criticized Bush's plans for new nukes, and the administration hadn't called the committee together in the year before it was disbanded.
7-29-2003

New York Times

Bush creates a system where people can invest in the possibility of terror attacks and international upheaval. This one didn't last long, and it showed just how important it is to have open government. From the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the same folks who brought us "Total Information Awareness" (and, years ago, the Internet), comes a project that would encourage investors to risk real money against the possibility of future events, like the overthrow of Jordan's king, or terrorist attacks. The idea would be to see whether such a system would have a predictive effect that would help us see world events before they happen. But the obvious ethical problems of essentially betting on chaos, death, and destruction forces the Pentagon to shut down the sickening project the day it becomes public.
7-22-2003

Reuters

Bush threatens veto if Congress overturns new FCC rules. When President Bush eased media ownership rules (see 6-3-2003 below), he never expected trouble from the Republican-controlled Congress. But an unprecedented public outcry against the new rules has put pressure on Congress to overturn the FCC's decision. But Bush isn't one to let something like "the will of the people" get in the way of his pro-corporate agenda. So he lets Congress know that if it overturns the new rules, he'll exercise his first veto. How appropriate that it will go to protect the profits of megacorporations!
7-16-2003

The Nation

Bush exposes an undercover CIA agent in an act of petty vengeance. Former Ambassador Joseph Wilson recently went public to say that he had investigated President Bush's State of the Union claim that Iraq tried to purchase uranium from Africa and had found the story not credible nearly a year before Bush's speech. Given the Bush administration's record, you'd expect some kind of retaliation or attempt to discredit Wilson from the White House or its surrogates. But Bush hits a new low when "senior administration officials" expose Wilson's wife as an undercover CIA agent to reporter Robert Novak, ruining her career and possibly endangering her life. Wilson calls it "a shot across the bow" to others who would speak out against the Bush administration. Seems like a pretty direct hit to me.
7-9-2003

New York Times

Bush obstructs September 11 investigation. Remember when President Bush's complaint with the weapons inspectors was that all their interviews were conducted in front of Iraqi government "minders"? Apparently he objected to the instance but likes the principle. When the independent commission (long opposed by Bush) investigating the attacks of September 11 interviews intelligence personnel, the Justice Department insists on having a "minder" in the room, chilling testimony before the commission. And that's just the tip of the Bush administration obstructionism iceberg. The commission complains of interference and noncooperation from all over the administration, noting that "problems that have arisen so far with the Department of Defense are becoming particularly serious."
7-8-2003

Washington Post

Bush proposes weakening Head Start. Head Start is that rarest of gems: an effective and universally lauded educational program. So why mess with success, right? But instead of expanding this preschool program that has been proven to give children a jump on learning, President Bush proposes changing the specific federal outlays to block grants that will give states more "flexibility" to spend the money. Given that states are in their worst fiscal crises since World War II, it's likely that they'll stretch the money and direct as much as possible away from Head Start.
7-6-2003

USA Today

Bush continues to push for new nuclear weapons. Radical conservative activists like the current President Bush a lot more than they did his father, and here's one reason why. Where Bush 41 put a moratorium on U.S. nuclear weapons tests in 1992, Bush 43 not only wants to resume tests, but wants to create entirely new kinds of nuclear weapons. Continuing with earlier efforts (see 2-20-2003 below), the Bush administration argues for smaller nukes that are much more likely to be used in combat.
January-June 2001 July-December 2001 January-June 2002 July-December 2002 January-June 2003 July-December 2003 January-June 2004 July-December 2004
Evil scale
Evil
Very evil
Very, very evil
Very, very, very evil
Very, very, very, very evil

 

 

end bug

The Wage Slave Journal is a collection of political commentary by Jesse Berney.

A complete table of contents is on the archives page.

All contents of the Wage Slave Journal are copyright Jesse Berney except for comments posted by readers and where otherwise noted. The opinions expressed on this site are mine alone.

 

David Corn Online

November 04, 2004

Dark Days Ahead

As promised below, here's the piece I wrote for The Nation magazine in my day-after exhaustion. The editors requested I look ahead, not behind. And I gazed into the dark future and concluded--guess what?--we're in for more of the same. (Didn't a certain presidential candidate warn of us of that?) Here it is. If you've seen it already, please scroll below or cruise through the comments for this and earlier postings.

Dark Days Ahead
by DAVID CORN
from the November 22, 2004 issue of The Nation

It's another four years--this time with a legitimate win behind him--and the prospects for George W. Bush's second term are grim. He is stronger politically; the Democratic opposition is weaker, especially in the Senate, where the Republicans gained several seats and closed in on a filibuster-proof super-majority. Bush and the GOP demonstrated that they could locate and mobilize their voters. The Democrats--even with big-money efforts (America Coming Together and its ad-buying sister outfit raised and spent more than $200 million)--could not match them. Bush now has more power than he did before the election. He will use it. And he is likely to adopt the game plan that served him well at the start of his first term: Move fast and move hard.

To what ends? Bush signaled his intentions before the election: partial privatization of Social Security, tax "reform" and tort "reform." And there is no reason not to take him at his word. On election night, Bush adviser Karen Hughes was talking about Social Security before the counting was done. "Ronald Reagan used his second term to justify nothing and to lay out an agenda for nothing," says Grover Norquist, a leading GOP activist/strategist. "Bush has already started laying out a vision of what he calls 'the ownership society.' It's a coherent worldview." It not only covers partial privatization of Social Security but the expansion of IRAs and health savings accounts. The point, says Norquist, is to wrap a Social Security initiative in a broader package with PR appeal. Norquist also envisions Bush pressing for a business-oriented tax cut before considering tax "reform." (Such a scheme will be billed as simplification, but it could also rejigger the tax code in favor of Bush's preferred beneficiaries: the rich.) And Bush will "shove" tort reform, Norquist says, "up the Democrats' backside."

The trend lines seem obvious. Bush can be expected to continue his undeclared war on environmental safeguards, to propose expanding the Patriot Act and to maintain his effective ban on stem-cell research. He has shown no willingness to reconsider decisions that have allowed various security needs--such as those at chemical plants and ports--to go unaddressed. He will further pursue policies that feed the gargantuan deficits and will deny the overwhelming fiscal fiasco. Before the election, his Administration was preparing for severe cuts in social programs. He may not take explicit steps to outlaw abortion. But he won't have to be explicit. It is inconceivable that Bush will not have the opportunity to appoint at least one Supreme Court Justice--William Rehnquist may provide the first vacancy--and he could get the chance to fill up to four openings. A Bush Court would be predisposed toward overturning Roe v. Wade. Presumably it would undermine environmental laws, be hostile to gay rights and put into action the goals of the right-wing "federalist" movement, which hails states' rights and property rights.

"On foreign policy, the big question mark," says Norquist, "is, What has the President and the Republican Party learned from Iraq? Did he learn it was a bridge too far and doesn't want to do three more of these? Or will he think, 'We got elected, let's do Egypt'?" Bush, Norquist adds, could end up at odds with conservatives on the "empire front." He observes, "If this is perpetual war to achieve perpetual peace, then it's out of sync with conservative members of Congress and his own base. They don't want a permanent garrison state with high taxes, a draft and a big government." But Bush has committed himself to "staying the course" (whatever it is) in Iraq and also to remaking the Middle East. He has fully embraced the hubris and arrogance of the neocons. Why should Bush change his fundamental national security views when he has escaped punishment for hyping a threat, misleading the country into an unnecessary war and alienating much of the globe?

The next four years could be dark ones. It is true that in recent decades second terms have been burdened by scandal (Watergate, Iran/contra, Monicagate). And the pattern could hold. Obstruction of justice in the Joe Wilson leak case? A Bush crony or relative caught profiting improperly in Iraq (Iraqgate)? And second-term administrations have often lost steam, as senior officials depart for high-paying private-sector jobs (while their White House connections are fresh) and are replaced by the B team. But Bush has often defied history: winning (sort of) in 2000 during a time of seeming prosperity and peace, protecting his party's position in Congress in mid-term elections and achieving re-election when the economy was down. History provides little comfort. And certainly the politics will be ugly. The Bush camp has been rewarded for its tactics of distortion and derision. Bush and Dick Cheney appealed to people's fears. And the lesson for them and the Republicans is clear: This worked, let's do more.

Who will lead the bloodied and weakened Democrats? Senate majority leader Tom Daschle was forcibly retired in South Dakota. Is there a successor who can do battle in the legislative mud pit and be a public force? Senator Hillary Clinton won't be vying for the job. It is a lousy launch pad for a presidential campaign. She, John Edwards, Howard Dean, Wesley Clark and others--Senator Joe Biden, Senator Evan Bayh, Al Gore, Governor Bill Richardson, Governor Tom Vilsack--will be busy jockeying for tactical advantage in 2008, as the progressive and centrist wings of the Democratic Party resume their ongoing brawl. Was Kerry too liberal? Was he too moderate? This debate has already begun.

But it was not just the Kerry campaign that fell short. The party professionals have much to answer for. The organizers did not churn out the necessary Democratic voters. The Dems in charge of Ohio misread the reality on the ground. Karl Rove, Bush's über-strategist, apparently succeeded in luring hordes of social conservatives to the polls in Ohio and elsewhere with anti-gay marriage initiatives. The so-called brains of the Democratic Party had no countervailing strategy.

There will be hard and dreadful days ahead for both the Democrats and the nation. The only good news is that the final tally--51 to 48 percent--demonstrates that there remains a great split in America. Praise that divide and prepare for the worst.
 

Posted by David Corn at 07:13 PM | Comments (42)

Coming Soon....

I've been decompressing. Haven't looked at the newspapers today. Haven't surfed. Have turned off the television. Instead, I applied for a new passport--just in case. (And that "just in case" is a joke.) And I took the kids to meet a friend and his family at the new National Museum of the American Indian. The displays certainly let you know that this country can make very big mistakes and not realize it--or deal with the consequences (moral and otherwise) of those sins--for years and years. I managed to catch a glimpse of Bush's press conference. (Q: How will you reach out to the other side, Mr. President? A: It's hard work, hard work.) But I made sure not to watch the whole thing. I'll check out the transcript. I couldn't help wondering why he didn't do such a long, open-ended session with reporters in the weeks before the election? It also caused me to ponder becoming a regular at White House press briefings. Should I be the new Helen Thomas? Helen after all, is still there. Let me know what you think. In any event, I'll be posting later today. I've been sitting on some interesting musings from a leading Republican about how GOPers may now feel freer to speak their minds about the mess in Iraq. Stay tuned. And, of course, visit the comments section and share what you're going through--and click on the ads to the right.

Posted by David Corn at 04:48 PM | Comments (55)

A Time To Heal? A "Mandate" from the People? Don't Buy the Pap

Two nations in one state--that is how it seems. So when Dick Cheney today exclaimed that he and George W. Bush have been handed a "mandate," he was once again engaging in blatant distortion. If you asked 100 people whether they wanted a beer that tastes great or one that is less filling and 51 chose the former and 48 went for the latter, no bartender would call that a "mandate" for the tasty brew. Bush and Cheney have done much to divide the body politic. Now they claim a "mandate" and profess a desire to unite the country. I was only able to observe a portion of Bush's speech this afternoon--I was, as the posting below notes, rushing to the warmth and comfort of home--but I did see him address John Kerry supporters and pledge to "work" to "deserve your trust." On CNN, Wolf Blitzer termed Bush's remarks "very gracious," and Judy Woodruff noted they would "go a long way to getting that [healing] under way." And I felt I was--or they were--in an alternative universe.

Does history not count? After winning the presidency in 2000 in a bitter and divisive contest, Bush pledged that he would reach out to the other side. He claimed he was a "uniter not a divider." He then did little to bridge the gulf. He appointed John Ashcroft--perhaps the most divisive member of the Senate at the time--attorney general. He forced his tax cuts package through without seeking any compromise with the Democrats. He ripped up the global warming treaty without offering any alternative--in essence telling the rest of the world to go take a hike. He assembled an energy task force that listened to corporate executives but did not hear out environmentalists, and he refused to say who was working with it. After 9/11, he campaigned against Democrats and claimed they did not care about the nation's security. And in the 2004 campaign, he repeatedly lied about Kerry, mischaracterizing his positions, distorting his words, assailing him as weak. And he stood by as his allies launched unsubstantiated attacks on Kerry's military service and character. That is how he won: by mocking Kerry and hurling false charges against him. And now he says he wants to win over Kerry's supporters?

It's a little late for that. My totally disillusioned, legal-alien wife just heard this particular Bush soundbite on the television and she angrily exclaimed, "Trust begins with the truth." She then clicked the remote and banished Bush from our presence. And she is right. (I'd be a fool to say anything else.) Bush had his chance. In fact, he had three chances. When he assumed the presidency, he could have made good on his promise. He did not. After 9/11, he had another opportunity, yet after a short interval he was back to the politics of fear, division and accusation. Then in this campaign, he could have endeavored to maintain a serious and somber discourse on the most pressing issues and challenges we face as a nation: the war in Iraq, the threat from al Qaeda and Islamic jihadism, the faltering economy. Instead, he resorted to cheap shots and disinformation (which I have chronicled extensively in items below).

So I beg to disagree with my pal Wolf. The time for graciousness is past. It's easy to be a gentleman after succeeding through down-and-dirty means. And, Judy, the words of a speechwriter are cheap. CNN White House correspondent John King reported that, yes, the president does know that the country was divided by this election, but he is "looking forward, not looking back." (Doing so, King informed us, is a "trademark of this president.") But that does not mean that we should. Bush has governed and campaigned in a divisive manner. A few sentences in a victory speech will not alter that. The slate is not wiped clean. Over 1100 Americans and thousands of Iraqis are still dead in Iraq for a war that was launched on the basis of untrue assertions. The tax burden still remains shifted toward the middle class. Bush's undeclared war on environmental protections still continues. He still supports amending the constitution to ban gay marriage. He still has in place a ban on effective stem cell research. He still has done nothing to remedy the gargantuan deficit.

Members of the Blue State Nation should not fall for let-bygones-be-bygones pap. Bush's phony vows are worth nothing. There is no mandate, there is no healing. There is a bitter fight over issues that matter greatly to the nation and the world. In his concession speech, Kerry said, "We're America, and America always moves forward." I have long liked Kerry (even though he can be rather frustrating as a politician), and I salute him for putting up a good fight. (There will be plenty of time to criticize his campaign.) But he is wrong on this point. Forward motion--progress, that is--is not guaranteed in America, or anywhere else. It only comes out of effort. A Supreme Court loaded with Bush appointees could quickly undo rights that were achieved over the course of years through hard work and struggle. America's standing in the world could--and probably will--continue to decline. The gap between the nation's well-off and poor has grown. Poverty rates have gone up in recent years. The number of Americans without health care coverage has increased. And there is no telling whether the United States is any safer today due to Bush's war in Iraq and his decisions regarding homeland security. It's arguable that the nation is less safe.

The country has not moved forward in the past four years, and it is unlikely to do so in the next four. In fact, the great divide in American politics that pundits often decry is a brake on policies that would take the country in the wrong direction. Bush opponents ought to not feel bad for resisting the can't-we-all-just-get-along urgings of commentator. Bush and Karl Rove declared war on Blue Staters; Blue Staters have the right--and obligation--to defend their land and fight back.

Posted by David Corn at 12:01 AM | Comments (201)

November 03, 2004

Live (Sort Of) From Boston, It's the Day After...and Time To Go Home

It's 1:30, the day after. Kerry just put off his concession speech a half hour. I am in the media filing center. It is mostly empty. One television is on. Wolf speaks. Most of the press has headed out to cover Kerry's farewell. (He does, though, remain a senator.) I have just filed a piece for The Nation magazine that goes to bed later today. The article looks at what to expect from the second-term. I'll put it up here when it is published. But you know the score: more of the same. There are dark days ahead. And those of us on the losing side of this great divide in America will have to build up our Blue State Nation. Something has to replace Red Sox Nation.

It will not be easy. The Dems are in a deep hole. There may be more of them than us (as voters) at this time. I'll have more to say and write on all this later. (Without reviewing the piece below, I stand by my preliminary, four-in-the-morning observations.) Right now I have one thought on my mind: get to the airport, get to my car, drive home, and see the wife and my wonderful daughters. I am lucky to have such consolation. It's not my ass in an unreinforced Humvee in Iraq. I'm not worried about losing childcare or school lunch subsidies for my family. I have a decent (if not great) health care plan. I'm not watching my job go overseas. (It's hard to outsource punditing.) I was able to marry the person I love. I will never need an abortion. You get the picture. Though I do work in a war zone of sorts--my office is on Capitol Hill and I must drive through two checkpoints a day to reach my parking space--others are more likely to pay for Bush's sins than me. But we all live in Bushworld--as do citizens around the globe--and we must bear the consequences of the decision made by those on the other side of our national divide. Fortify yourselves however best you can. (I notice many of this blog's commenters fancy the power of a good, stiff drink. Have one on me.) And I'll be posting again shortly. Now it's time to dash home....And please click on the new Amnesty International ad to the right and let them know you're still engaged and part of the fight. Onward.

Posted by David Corn at 01:46 PM | Comments (204)

Bush Wins (Or Seems To)--Let the Great American Divide Continue!

Below is the "Capital Games" column I posted on www.thenation.com on the election at 4:00 in the morning. If you've seen it already, please scroll down to see other items.

BUSH WINS (OR SEEMS TO)
LET THE GREAT AMERICAN DIVIDE CONTINUE
11/03/04

By DAVID CORN
It's 3:30 AM. Ohio looks bad for John Kerry. He's down 180,000 votes. There may be 175,000 provisional ballots. But can Kerry win practically every single one and find other votes there? Kerry is losing by 1700 votes in New Mexico and 15,000 in Iowa. John Edwards appeared before Kerry supporters in Copley Square and promised that the Kerry campaign will fight to count every vote. But the Kerry ticket is behind in the national numbers, on the short end of a 51-48 split, trailing Bush by almost 4 million votes, with 93 percent of the precincts reporting. The election was close, achingly close. There may be an odd bounce or two yet to come. But the safe assumption is that George W. Bush will emerge the winner of the electoral vote and the popular vote. It's a sad morning in America.

The electorate almost engaged in a much-needed political correction. It almost undid the asterisk of 2000. Instead, voters legitimized the fellow who gained the White House against the will of the majority and who then pretended he had a mandate and subsequently pushed tax cuts for the well-to-do and launched a war predicated on untrue assertions. So there will be no good-bye to reckless preemptive war, an economic policy based on tax breaks tilted toward the wealthy, a war on environmental regulations, a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, excessive secrecy in government, unilateral machismo, the neocon theology of hubris and arrogance, a ban on effective stem cell research, no-bid Halliburton contracts, John Ashcroft, Donald Rumsfeld, and much more. Did I mention Dick Cheney?

Bush lied his way into office and lied his way through his presidency. His reelection campaign was based on derision and disingenuousness; he mischaracterized Kerry and his positions and touted successes that did not exist. And now, it seems, he got away with it. He was not punished for leading the country into a war that was not necessary. He was not booted for having overstated the WMD threat from Iraq. He paid no price for failing to plan adequately for the post-invasion period. Iraq remains his mess. And the United States and the world remains at the mercy of a gang that, no doubt, will feel even more emboldened to pursue their misguided policies.

The good news: America is a divided nation. Despite the pundit hand-wringing over this fact, it is a positive thing. Nearly-- nearly--half of the electorate rejected Bush's leadership, his agenda, his priorities, his falsehoods. From Eminem to the chairman of Bank of America to 48 Nobel laureates to gangbangers who joined anti-Bush get-out-the-vote efforts in swing states. Nearly half of the voting public concluded that Bush had caused the deaths of over 1100 American GIs and literally countless Iraqis (maybe 100,000) for no compelling reason. Nearly half saw the emperor buck naked and butt ugly. Nearly half said no to his rash actions and dishonest justifications. Nearly half realized that Bush had misrepresented the war in Iraq as a crucial part of the effort against al Qaeda and Islamic jihadism. Nearly half desired better and more honest leadership. Nearly half knew that Bush has led the country astray.

Other good news: Second-term presidents often hit the skids. The last three second- terms were marked by scandal (Watergate, Iran-contra, Monicagate). And as top officials sprint through the revolving door to snag high-paying jobs (while their contacts are fresh), the job of running the government during the second administration often falls to the B Team. In the post-9/11 world, this is not all that reassuring. But the historical trend does suggest that Bush will have trouble enacting his various schemes. Yet--let's be realistic--the Senate results indicate that the GOP will expand its majority in the Senate, which means Bush will have more allies for his wrongheaded missions.

More good news; Bush will not be able to hand off his own wreckage--Iraq and the gargantuan deficit--to a new man. But this does not mean he will accept responsibility and deal with it. Bush has the ability to deny and defy reality. And if he cannot see that the trash has piled up, he will not be hauling it to the curb.

Okay, no more good news. I can't stand all this good news. Bush has bamboozled and frightened just enough Americans to gain the opportunity to flimflam them for another four years. And the rest of the country--and the globe--will be along for the dangerous ride.

As for John Kerry, he and his advisers loed like geniuses early on Election Day, when exit polls showed him ahead in the critical states There will be time--plenty of time--to critique Kerry and his crew and second-guess their various decisions. Had he swatted down the Swift Vets earlier would that have saved him just the right number of votes? Had he voted against granting Bush the authorization to launch an elective war against Iraq anytime Bush damn well pleased, perhaps Kerry would have presented a clearer picture for the electorate and inoculated himself from the trumped-up flip-flop charge. Perhaps. He, too, will have years to ponder all of this.

Kerry was no top-gun campaigner. His rhetoric often meandered. More than once he shot himself in the foot with inartful language. But he did vigorously criticize Bush for misleading the country into war and for screwing up (big time!) the planning for the post-invasion period. He called for expanding health care coverage and for dramatic investments in alternative energy. He slammed Bush for ignoring the middle class crisis. He advocated raising the minimum wage and vowed to take on such special interests as the prescription drugs lobby. He excoriated Bush's assault on environmental safeguards and defended abortion rights. And he effectively used the three debates to counter the Bush camp's claim that he was a finger-in-the-wind pol and a weak-kneed opportunist with no convictions. Those encounters hurt Bush. Of those voters who say they decided in the past month, Kerry led 60 to 37 percent. All of this--it almost worked.

There was a clear difference between the two candidates. They disagreed on many basic issues. But--perhaps more importantly--they represented vastly different ways of engaging the world. One has adopted an ask-no-questions, nevermind-the- nuances, don't-look-back, tough-guy style of leadership. The other promised to consider and reach out before leaping. One said--practically boasted--that he read no newspapers. The other came across as a man who absorbed much information before rendering a decision. The voters chose the wrong man.

But not all is lost. The Red-Blue battle--a war of culture, ideology, politics and psychology--will not end with the final tally in Ohio. The forces of Bushism appear to have triumphed this day. But life--if we are lucky--is long, and history never ends. Let the great divide in America continue.

Posted by David Corn at 04:09 AM | Comments (171)

Live From Boston, It's Election Day: Part Seven--The End?

This site is under construction....Just kidding. Sorry, it's late and I am depressed....The numbers do not look favorable for Kerry. John Edwards just came out and told the folks who have been waiting in Copley Square that the Kerry campaign will make sure that "every vote will count" and that it "will fight for every vote." Then he left--without a goodbye. But the Ohio results are increasingly lousy for Kerry. It appears that Bush will end up with a 150,000 or so lead there. Can there be enough provisional ballots for Kerry to overcome that? New Mexico is trending toward Bush. And there are 1.6 million absentee ballots in Florida, but the gap in that state is 350,000. Can Kerry win almost two-thirds of those absentee ballots? In the national count, Kerry is down 3.5 million, with 90 percent of the vote in. He's on the wrong end of a 51-48 split. (Looks like Ralph Nader for the moment escapes the spoiler charge.) There is much for Kerry to surmount. Color me a pessimist.

In the media center, reporters mill about and wonder if any of the Kerry aides will come by to tell us what to do. (Last time Joe Lockhart and Mike McCurry briefed us, they looked not too happy. And when I pointed out the daunting math in Ohio, Lockhart had no real response.) This reminds me of four years ago. I was in Austin, and journalists waited until 4:00 in morning for Bush spinners to appear and say what was--or what was not--going on. We were like school kids without a teacher. When no one showed, we shrugged our shoulders and went home. People are packing now. I've written two versions of an article. But I have not posted either. Joe Lockhart, Mike McCurry, where are you?....Stay tuned. Or, rather, go to sleep. If there is any news tonight, it will likely not be good news.

Posted by David Corn at 02:34 AM | Comments (11)

Live From Boston, It's Election Day: Part Six--Fear in McAuliffe's Eyes

Abandon hope? Democratic Party chairman Terry McAuliffe came through the media room a little while back. I thought I saw fear--or worry--in his sharp eyes. Ohio, Ohio, Ohio--that's what he and Michael McCurry keep telling us. As goes Ohio....But right now, Bush is leading in that state--up by nearly 200,000 voters, with 68 percent of the precincts reporting. I just went to the Ohio state website and looked at the county list. There still are some big Democratic counties that have not fully reported, such as Cuyahoga (Cleveland). But there also are a fair number of smaller counties that are trending Republican that have not fully reported. It doesn't look like it will be easy for Kerry to close the gap in Ohio. Possible, but....Oh, shit.

Posted by David Corn at 12:23 AM | Comments (34)









 

Blogads
Can you pass the torture test?
Is torture an effective way to get information? Does the US have a torture-free record? Amnesty International challenges you to test your knowledge and take the test. (Requires Flash.)
Last Laugh
Richie Bush stars in "Last Laugh," an animated cartoon from Peter Kuper.

Click here to watch the cartoon.

Click here for info about Peter's new book, Sticks and Stones.

 
All the President's Pets
Scotties are ranked 44th in popularity among US dog owners -- not that the popular vote necessarily matters.

The German Shepherd is ranked fourth in popularity. (Even Ralph Nader is ranked third among the human candidates.)

Which will be the next pet?
YOU DECIDE
     

 

George W. Bush

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

 


 

George W. Bush
George W. Bush
Order: 43rd President
Term of Office: January 20, 2001–Present
Predecessor: Bill Clinton
Date of Birth: Saturday, July 6, 1946
Place of Birth: New Haven, Connecticut
First Lady: Laura Bush
Profession: Businessman
Political Party: Republican
Vice President: Dick Cheney

George Walker Bush (born July 6, 1946) is the 43rd and current President of the United States. His first four-year term as President began on January 20, 2001. After a fierce campaign, he won a second term after the election was conceded by his opponent John Kerry on November 3, 2004. His second term ends January 20, 2009.

Before assuming the presidency, Bush was a businessman. He served as Governor of Texas from 1995 to 2000. He is the son of former President George Herbert Walker Bush and the brother of Florida Governor Jeb Bush.

Contents [hide]

 

Personal life, service, and education

George W. Bush was born in New Haven, Connecticut to parents George and Barbara Bush, and grew up in Midland and Houston, Texas. He has four younger siblings: Jeb, Neil, Marvin, and Dorothy. A younger sister, Robin, died of leukemia in 1953 at the age of three.

George W. Bush and Laura Bush with their daughters Jenna and Barbara, 1990

George W. Bush and Laura Bush with their daughters Jenna and Barbara, 1990

George W. Bush in his national guardsman uniform.

George W. Bush in his national guardsman uniform.

The Bush family watches tee ball on the White House lawn.

The Bush family watches tee ball on the White House lawn.

As was his father, Bush was educated at Phillips Academy (Andover) (September 1961–June 1964) and Yale University (September 1964–May 1968). While at Yale he joined Delta Kappa Epsilon (where he was president from October 1965 until graduation), and the Skull and Bones society . He played baseball during his freshman year and rugby during his freshman and senior years. He received a bachelor's degree in history in 1968.

After graduating from Yale, Bush enlisted in the Texas Air National Guard on May 27, 1968 during the Vietnam War, with a commitment to serve until May 26, 1974. He served as an F-102 pilot until 1972 and was twice promoted during his service, first to second lieutenant and then to first lieutenant. In November 1970, Lt. Col. Jerry B. Killian, the commander of the Texas Air National Guard, recommended that Bush be promoted to first lieutenant.

In September 1973 he received permission to end his six-year commitment six months early in order to attend Harvard University. He transferred to inactive reserve status shortly before being honorably discharged on October 1, 1973.

However, when Bush began his political career, his opponents and journalists began to raise questions about his service record. It has been charged that he skipped over a waiting list to receive a coveted National Guard slot, that he did not report for required duty, and that he was suspended from flying after he missed a required physical examination. These issues were publicized during the 2004 campaign by Texans for Truth and other Bush critics. See George W. Bush military service controversy for details.

Bush entered Harvard Business School in 1973. He was awarded a Master of Business Administration (MBA) in 1975, making him the first U.S. president to hold an MBA degree.

On Labor Day weekend, September 4, 1976, Bush was pulled over by police near his family's Kennebunkport summer home in Maine. He was arrested and fined $150 and temporary suspension of driving privileges in the state for driving under the influence of alcohol. News of the arrest was released five days before the 2000 presidential election by the Kennebunkport police department.

Bush married Laura Welch in 1977. They have twin daughters, Barbara and Jenna Bush, born in 1981. In 1986, at age 40, he became a born-again Christian, leaving the Episcopal Church and joining his wife's denomination, the United Methodist Church.

Bush has described his days before his religious conversion as his "nomadic" period and "irresponsible youth". Bush admitted to drinking "too much" in those years. He gave up drinking for good shortly after his 40th birthday celebration. A number of reasons were cited for the change including a 1985 meeting with Rev. Billy Graham. CNN reported during the 2000 campaign that Bush said "I quit drinking in 1986 and haven't had a drop since then." [1] (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/campaigns/wh2000/stories/bushtext072599.htm) [2] (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/campaigns/wh2000/stories/bush072599.htm) [3] (http://www.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/11/02/bush.dui/)

Bush has addressed the issue of his alleged cocaine abuse on several occasions. The 2000 campaign initially refused to answer on principle, but later Bush told the press that, as a condition of Federal employment, he had signed a form averring he had not taken drugs in the previous seven years. When asked if he could have signed it when his father was president, he paused to think, and then answered that he could have. But Bush refused to answer if he had ever taken cocaine.

Bush is sometimes referred to as Dubya (which is a Southern dialect variant of "Double U"), a play on his middle initial "W". His Secret Service codename is Trailblazer.

 

Business and political career

In 1978, Bush ran for the U.S. House of Representatives but lost to State Sen. Kent Hance, a Democrat.

George W. Bush's portrait as Governor of Texas (1995-2000).

George W. Bush's portrait as Governor of Texas (1995-2000).

Bush listens as Democratic opponent Al Gore states a point during a debate.

Bush listens as Democratic opponent Al Gore states a point during a debate.

Al Gore greets President-Elect Bush at the White House in late December of 2000.

Al Gore greets President-Elect Bush at the White House in late December of 2000.

Bush began his career in the oil industry in 1979 when he established Arbusto Energy, an oil and gas exploration company he formed in 1977 with leftover funds from his education trust fund and money from other investors. (Years later, he was criticized because some of the funding came from the bin Laden family.) The 1979 energy crisis hurt Arbusto and, after a name change to Bush Exploration Co., Bush sold the company in 1984 to Spectrum 7, another Texas oil and gas exploration firm. Under the terms of the sale, Bush became CEO of Spectrum 7. History was repeated as the oil crisis of 1985-1986 bankrupted Spectrum 7. Spectrum 7 was subsequently saved by a buyout from Harken Energy Corp. in 1986 with Bush becoming a director of Harken.

After working on his father's successful 1988 presidential campaign, he was told by friend William DeWitt, Jr. that then-owner Eddie Chiles, another of the Bushes' many friends, wanted to sell the Texas Rangers, an Arlington-based Major League Baseball franchise. In April 1989, Bush assembled a group of investors from his father's close friends, who bought 86% of the Rangers for $75 million. (Bush later appointed one of these partners, Tom Schieffer to the post of Ambassador to Australia.) Critics expressed concern about the propriety of the purchase, charging use of political influence and favoritism involving a family friend. [4] (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/campaigns/wh2000/stories/bushside073199.htm)) Bush invested $606,302, with $500,000 of it a loan from a bank. Bush paid off the loan by selling $848,000 worth of stock in Harken Energy Corp. in 1990. Critics allege insider trading, although the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) ended a 1992 investigation with a memo stating "it appears that Bush did not engage in illegal insider trading", but noted that the memo "must in no way be construed as indicating that the party has been exonerated or that no action may ultimately result."[5] (http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/07/03/bush.stock/) In fact, had Bush held the stock another year, he would have profited even more. Critics allege that the investigation was influenced by the fact that Bush's father was President at the time, although no action was taken during Bill Clinton's presidency either. As President, Bush has refused to authorize the SEC to release its full report on the investigation. Bush personally earned US$14.9 million from his $606,302 investment in the 1998 sale of the team for $250 million at a total profit of US$170 million. [6] (http://www.austinchronicle.com/issues/vol17/issue19/pols.bush.html)

He served as managing general partner of the Rangers until he was elected Governor of Texas on November 8, 1994 over incumbent Democrat Ann Richards. He went on to become, in 1998, the first Texas governor to be elected for two consecutive four-year terms. His tenure in office featured a positive reputation for bipartisan leadership. Among issues attracting national and international attention during his terms was Texas' use of the death penalty. He signed the death warrants of 152 criminals, including that of Karla Faye Tucker.

In Bush's 2000 presidential election campaign, he campaigned on, among other issues, allowing religious charities to compete on an equal basis for participation in federally funded programs, reducing taxes, promoting the use of education vouchers, supporting oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, and restructuring of the armed forces. In foreign policy, he stated he was against using the U.S. armed forces in "nation building" attempts abroad.

Bush became President on January 20, 2001 as the winner of one of the closest general elections in U.S. history, defeating Democratic Vice President Al Gore in 30 of 50 states for a narrow victory by five electoral votes. Gore won a plurality of the nationwide popular vote by approximately 540,000 votes out of 105 million, a margin of barely one-half of one percent. It was the first presidential election since the 1888 election in which a candidate lost the popular vote while winning the electoral college vote. The electoral college outcome could have been altered by a difference of only a few hundred (537/2) popular votes in Florida.

The Florida vote, which favored Bush by a tiny margin in the initial count, was heavily contested after concerns were raised about flaws and irregularities in the voting process, and became the subject of a series of contentious court cases. After a Supreme Court decision in mid-December favoring Bush, Gore conceded the election. The election results are still disputed by many, though no longer contested in any legal venue. See U.S. presidential election, 2000.

 

Presidency

 

Foreign policy and security

George W. Bush flanked by wife Laura Bush, Marta Sahagún Fox, and Mexican President Vicente Fox

George W. Bush flanked by wife Laura Bush, Marta Sahagún Fox, and Mexican President Vicente Fox


During his first presidential visit to Europe in June 2001, Bush came under harsh criticism from European leaders for his rejection of the Kyoto Protocol, which is aimed at reducing carbon dioxide emissions that may contribute to global warming. The treaty, however, had already been rejected by the United States Senate on the grounds that it would exempt polluting nations classified as "developing", such as China. Currently, the treaty has not been ratified by the required minimum of nations to put it into force. However, as of 2004, Russia is going to ratify it. This leaves USA, with the largest emissions in the world, in a politically uncomfortable position when the treaty comes into effect.

Bush imposition of a tariff on imported steel and on Canadian soft lumber was controversial in light of his pursuit of other free market policies, and attracted criticism both from his fellow conservatives and from nations affected. The steel tariff was later rescinded under pressure from the WTO.

During his campaign, Bush's foreign policy platform included support of a stronger economic and political relationship with Latin America, especially Mexico, and a reduction in involvement in "nation-building" and other small-scale military engagements. However, after the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attacks, the administration focused much more on foreign policy in the Middle East.

Shortly after the attacks, a war was launched against Afghanistan to topple the Taliban, accused of harboring Osama bin Laden. This action had fairly strong international support, and the Taliban government folded quickly after the invasion. However, subsequent nation-building efforts in concert with the United Nations under Hamid Karzai have proved troublesome, and bin Laden was never apprehended nor believed to have been killed. A large contingent of troops and advisors remains through 2004. See U.S. invasion of Afghanistan for details. Democratic elections were held on October 9, 2004, although marred by flawed registration and validation and threatened withdrawal of 15 of 18 presidential candidates. International observers called the elections "fairly democratic" at the "overall majority" of polling centers.

On December 14, 2001, Bush scrapped the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, which had been a bedrock of U.S.-Soviet nuclear stability during the Cold War, arguing it was no longer relevant. Instead, Bush focused resources on a ballistic missile defense system. The proposed system has been the subject of much scientific criticism. Field tests have been mixed, with both some successes and failures. It is scheduled to start deployment in 2005. A ballistic missile defense system will not stop cruise missiles, or missiles transported by boat or land vehicle. Hence, many critics of the system believe it is an expensive mistake, built for the least likely attack, a nuclear tipped ballistic missile. Bush has also increased spending on military research and development and the modernization of weapons systems, but cancelled programs such as the Crusader self-propelled artillery system. The administration also began initial research into bunker-busting nuclear missiles.

Beginning in 2002 and escalating in spring 2003, Bush pressed the UN to act on its disarmament mandates to Iraq, precipitating a diplomatic crisis. He began by pushing for UN weapons inspections in Iraq, which he received with passage of the UN Security Council Resolution 1441, which allowed inspectors lead by Hans Blix and Mohamed ElBaradei to investigate Bush's allegations. Increasing pressure from the United States in the spring of 2003 forced the UN weapons inspectors to leave the country, unable to verify the existence of WMD (weapons of mass destruction). The Bush administration examined the possibility of a new resolution from the Security Council, but when it became clear that the majority of the members (including most of the permanent members with vetoing power) would vote against such a resolution the matter was never taken to a vote (cf. The UN Security Council and the Iraq war). The United States managed to gather a group of countries to support a war, a total of about forty. They have been called "coalition of the willing" and while most of them are small there were some notable exceptions such as the United Kingdom, Japan and Spain. Spain has since pulled out of the war.

The United States invaded Iraq in March, citing the old resolution and the lack of Iraq cooperation. The original stated goal of the war was to stop Iraq from deploying and developing WMD and to topple the dictator Saddam Hussein. The war proved extremely divisive, without any clear resolution and some of the U.S.'s long-term allies such as France and Germany strongly opposed to it. In many countries there have also been civilian opposition and antiwar protests, on a scale not seen since the Vietnam War. The war was called illegal by the Secretary General of the United Nations Kofi Annan.

While the Iraqi armed forces fell apart within a few days the problems in Iraq have since escalated. The difficulties in the occupation and implementation of a democracy, the failure to find Saddam's alleged weapons, and claims about information having been allegedly spun or distorted to support the war have all been used to challenge the Bush administration both domestically and from abroad. These claims have been corroborated by investigations and reports by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. Nevertheless, Bush states that he still believes it was the right decision, because a demonstrably brutal tyrant has been overthrown and can no longer threaten the world. See 2003 invasion of Iraq for full coverage.

In July of 2002, Bush cut off all funding to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). Bush claimed that the UNFPA supported forced abortions and sterilizations in China.

Bush's foreign policy is influenced by the neo-conservative think tank Project for the New American Century, many of whose members have prominent positions in the Bush administration. Many argue that the administration is far more inspired by the Heritage Foundation, and to a lesser degree the Cato Institute, although these organizations lack representation in the administration.

 

Domestic policy

George W. Bush raises his arm to greet an audience of firefighters on November 4, 2003, as California Governor-Elect Arnold Schwarzenegger and Gov. Gray Davis listen.

George W. Bush raises his arm to greet an audience of firefighters on November 4, 2003, as California Governor-Elect Arnold Schwarzenegger and Gov. Gray Davis listen.

George W. Bush speaks at a campaign rally in St. Petersburg, Florida, October 19, 2004

George W. Bush speaks at a campaign rally in St. Petersburg, Florida, October 19, 2004

President Bush has endorsed an amendment to the United States Constitution that defines marriage as being between a man and a woman, which would ban same-sex marriage, but leaves open the possibility of civil unions. Bush has tended to be opposed to forms of affirmative action, but expressed appreciation for the Supreme Court's ruling upholding selecting college applicants for purposes of diversity. Although President Bush did meet with the National Urban League, he is the first sitting President not to meet with the NAACP since Herbert Hoover.

President Bush has implemented three tax cuts during his term in office that eliminated the "marriage penalty" and the "death tax" and reduced marginal tax rates. These cuts were enacted by Congress with large bipartisan majorities, but were later criticized as regressive give-aways. Bush advocates the partial privatization of Social Security wherein an individual would be free to invest a portion of his Social Security taxes in personal retirement accounts. This initiative has not yet been considered by Congress.

Bush signed the Medicare Act of 2003, which added prescription drug coverage to Medicare, subsidized companies that sell these drugs, and prohibited the Federal government from negotiating discounts with drug companies.

Of the US$2.4 trillion budgeted for 2005, about US$401 billion [7] (http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/2004/nr20040202-0301.html) are planned to be spent on defense. This level is generally comparable to the defense spending during the cold war. [8] (http://www.d-n-i.net/charts_data/evolution_of_the_fy_2003_budget.htm)

In January of 2003, Bush signed the No Child Left Behind Act, which targets supporting early learning, measures student performance, gives options over failing schools, and ensures more resources for schools. Critics (including Senator Kerry and the National Education Association) say schools were not given the resources to help meet new standards despite a 50% increase in federal education spending. Some state governments are refusing to implement provisions of the act as long as they are not adequately funded. [9] (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A52720-2004Feb18.html)

Scientists have repeatedly criticized the Bush administration for reducing funding for scientific research, setting restrictions on federal funding of stem cell research, ignoring scientific consensus on global warming, and hampering cooperation with foreign scientists by enforcing deterring immigration and visa restrictions. In February 2004, over 5,000 scientists (including 48 Nobel Prize winners) from the Union of Concerned Scientists signed a statment "opposing the Bush administration's use of scientific advice". They felt that "the Bush administration has ignored unbiased scientific advice in the policy-making that is so important for our collective welfare". [10] (http://www.ucsusa.org/global_environment/rsi/page.cfm?pageID=1320) [11] (http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=scienceNews&storyID=5476374)[12] (http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5722898/)

On January 14, 2004, Bush announced a "space vision" (http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/space/01/14/bush.space/index.html), calling for a return to the Moon by 2020, the completion of the International Space Station by 2010 and eventually sending astronauts to Mars. However, the plan faces funding problems, and Bush has not mentioned the initiative since his speech. [13] (http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/world/8572141.htm?1c).

Bush's environmental record has been largely criticized by environmentalists, who charge that his policies cater to industry demands to weaken environmental protections. He did sign the Great Lakes Legacy Act of 2002 authorizing the Federal government to begin cleaning up pollution and contaminated sediment in the Great Lakes. He signed the Brownfields Legislation in 2002, accelerating the cleanup of abandoned industrial sites, or brownfields, to better protect public health, create jobs, and revitalize communities. In December 2003, President Bush signed legislation implementing key provisions of his Healthy Forests Initiative. Similar to most of his domestic policy, he claims to be doing precisely the opposite of his actions when he talks about clear skies while permitting higher levels of pollution.

 

Cabinet

Bush's cabinet possesses the largest number of minorities of any U.S. federal cabinet to date, including the first two Asian-American federal cabinet secretaries. It is also, according to the Guinness Book of Records, the wealthiest cabinet ever.

Only one non-Republican is present in Bush's cabinet. Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, the first Asian-American cabinet secretary, had previously served as Secretary of Commerce under Bill Clinton; he is the sole Democrat in the Bush cabinet.

His cabinet includes figures prominent in past Republican administrations, notably Colin Powell, who had served as United States National Security Advisor under Ronald Reagan and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under George H. W. Bush, and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, who had served in the same position under Gerald Ford.

 
OFFICE NAME TERM
 
President George W. Bush 2001–
Vice President Dick Cheney 2001–
 
State Colin Powell 2001–
Defense Donald Rumsfeld 2001–
Treasury Paul O'Neill 2001–2003
  John W. Snow 2003–
Justice John Ashcroft 2001–
Interior Gale Norton 2001–
Commerce Donald Evans 2001–
Labor Elaine Chao 2001–
Agriculture Ann Veneman 2001–
HHS Tommy Thompson 2001–
Education Rod Paige 2001–
HUD Mel Martinez 2001–2003
  Alphonso Jackson 2004–
Transportation Norman Mineta 2001–
Energy Spencer Abraham 2001–
Veterans Affairs Anthony Principi 2001–
Homeland Security Tom Ridge 2003–


 

 

Other advisors and officials

Among the more criticized appointments have been John Negroponte, Elliott Abrams, Otto Reich, and John Poindexter for their roles in the Iran-Contra Affair and for allegedly covering up human rights abuses in Central and South America. Additionally, some appointments have been accused of being nepotism, including: Michael Powell (son of Secretary of State Colin Powell) as FCC Chairman, 28-year-old J. Strom Thurmond Jr (Sen. Strom Thurmond's son) as South Carolina's U.S. Attorney, Eugene Scalia (Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia's son) as Solicitor for the Labor Department, Janet Rehnquist (U.S. Chief Justice William Rehnquist's daughter) as Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services (later fired for firearms charges and inappropriate job terminations), and Elizabeth Cheney (Vice Pres. Dick Cheney's daughter) to the newly-created position Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near-East Affairs.

 

Legislation

Partial list:

 

Public perception and assessments

In the time of national crisis following the September 11, 2001 attacks, Bush briefly enjoyed approval ratings of greater than 85 percent. Bush maintained these extraordinary ratings (the highest approval ratings of any president since such regular polls began in 1938) for some months following the attack, though they gradually dropped to lower levels.

During the 2002 midterm congressional elections, Bush had the highest approval rating of any president during a mid-term election since Dwight Eisenhower, and subsequently the Republican Party retook control of the Senate and added to their majority in the House of Representatives. These results marked an unusual deviation from the historic trend of the President's party losing congressional seats in the midterm elections, and was just the third time since the Civil War that the party in control of the White House gained seats in both houses of Congress in a midterm election (others were 1902 and 1934). One explanation for this historic event is that Bush's wartime popularity carried over to other Republicans in races for legislative office. Another is that the singularly close election of Bush in 2000 complicates expectations based on general historic trends.

In 2003, Bush's approval ratings continued their slow descent from the 2001 highs, with 13 major polls agreeing on a remarkably stable and consistent 1.7% per month decline (http://www.hist.umn.edu/~ruggles/Approval.htm) for his entire presidency with the exceptions of only three significant increases: immediately after 9/11, during the Iraq War, and the capture of Saddam Hussein. By late 2003, his approval numbers were in the low to middle 50s. Nevertheless, his numbers were still solid for the third year of a Presidency, when the President's opponents typically begin their campaigns in earnest. Most polls tied the decline to growing concern over the U.S.-led occupation of Iraq and the economy's slow recovery from the 2001 recession. Late during the Democratic primary, most major polls showed Bush losing to the various Democratic challengers by a narrow margin. Polls of May 2004 showed anywhere from a 53 percent approval rating [15] (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/Bush_Job_Approval.htm) to a 46 percent approval rating. [16] (http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/polls/usatodaypolls.htm) Composite time-series graphs of Bush's approval ratings from January 2001 to May 2004 are available at [17] (http://www.hist.umn.edu/~ruggles/Approval.htm) [18] (http://www.pollkatz.homestead.com/files/pollkatzmainGRAPHICS_8911_image001.gif), an analysis of G. W. Bush's popularity over time is available at [19] (http://www.polisci.wisc.edu/~behavior/perspective(Oct2003).pdf).

George W. Bush has been the subject of both high praise and stringent criticism, and has been called by some the "love him or hate him" president. The former has focused on matters such as the economy, homeland security, and especially his leadership after the September 11 attacks; the latter on matters such as the economy, the controversial 2000 election, and the occupation of Iraq.

 

Outside the United States

President Bush and French President Jacques Chirac during the G-8 sessions, July 21, 2001.

President Bush and French President Jacques Chirac during the G-8 sessions, July 21, 2001.

Bush's popularity outside the United States is generally lower. In many parts of the world he is very unpopular, with many reporting a dislike of his personality and foreign policy. The 2003 Invasion of Iraq particularly provoked charges of unilateralism. Recent polls indicate erosion of support among Europeans for Bush, for example a drop from 36% to 16% favorability over the last year in Germany.[20] (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3081254.stm) A broader Associated Press/Ipsos survey of industrialized nations found that a majority of people in France, Italy, Germany, Mexico, Spain—in addition to Canada and the UK, where Anglo-American cooperation traditionally reigns—have an unfavorable view of Bush and his policy on foreign affairs, although significant minorities continue to report favorable views. [21] (http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/03/04/world/main604135.shtml) In Muslim countries Bush's unfavorability ratings are particularly high, often over 90%. [22] (http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/02/opinion/02wright.html) Among the non-U.S. nations polled in a worldwide study, Bush's popularity was highest in Israel, where 62% reported favorable views. [23] (http://www.cbc.ca/news/america/poll.html)

A July and August 2004 survey by the University of Maryland and GlobeScan, Inc. of 34,330 people in 35 nations found that, in 30 out of 35 countries polled, a majority or plurality would prefer to see Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry win in the 2004 election. Kerry was strongly preferred by traditional European allies like Norway (74% for Kerry to 7% for Bush), Germany (74% to 10%), France (64% to 5%), the Netherlands (63% to 6%), Italy (58% to 14%), Spain (45% to 7%), and the United Kingdom (47% to 16%). Also other allies such as Japan (43% to 23%), Mexico (38% to 18%), Turkey (40% to 25%) and South Africa (43% to 29%). The only countries where President Bush was preferred by a majority were the Philippines, Nigeria, and Poland. India and Thailand were divided. [24] (http://www.globescan.com/news_archives/GlobeScan-PIPA_Release.pdf) An October [25] (http://www.guardian.co.uk/flash/0,5860,1327656,00.html)poll by a range of major international newspapers show that in Australia, Britain, Canada, France, Japan, Spain and South Korea a majority of voters share a rejection of the Iraq invasion, contempt for the Bush administration and a growing hostility to the U.S.; however, while they all oppose the Bush government's politics, they do not express a dislike of American people.

 

Further reading

  • George W. Bush, A Charge to Keep, (1999) ISBN 0688174418
  • George W. Bush, We Will Prevail, (2003) ISBN 0826415520
  • Ronald Kessler, A Matter Of Character: Inside The White House Of George W. Bush, Penguin, USA, August, 2004, hardcover, 320 pages, ISBN 1595230009
  • David Frum, The Right Man, (2003) ISBN 0375509038 ISBN 0812966953
  • Robert Bryce, Cronies: Oil, The Bushes, and the Rise of Texas, America's Superstate, PublicAffairs, ISBN 1586481886
  • Bob Woodward, Bush At War, (2002) ISBN 0743244613
  • Bob Woodward, Plan of Attack, (2004) ISBN 074325547X
  • K. Auletta (January 19, 2004). Fortress Bush: How the White House Keeps the Press Under Control, The New Yorker, LXXIX, 53.
  • Bill Sammon, Fighting Back: The War on Terrorism from Inside the Bush White House, (2002) ISBN 0895261499
  • B. Minutaglio, First Son: George W. Bush and the Bush Family Dynasty (1999) ISBN 0609808672
  • Stephen Mansfield, The Faith of George W. Bush, (2003) ISBN 1585423092
  • M. Ivins and L. Dubose, Shrub: The Short but Happy Political Life of George W. Bush (2000) ISBN 0375503994
  • Ian Williams, Deserter: George Bush's War on Military Families, Veterans, and His Past ISBN 1560256273
  • E. Mitchell, W: Revenge of the Bush Dynasty (2000) ISBN 0786866306
  • H. Gillman, The Votes That Counted: How the Court Decided the 2000 Presidential Election (2001) ISBN 0226294080
  • J. H. Hatfield, Fortunate Son: George W. Bush and the Making of an American President (1999) ISBN 1887128840
  • Ben Fritz, Bryan Keefer & Brendan Nyhan, All the President's Spin: George W. Bush, the Media, and the Truth (2004) ISBN 0743262514
  • Craig Unger, House of Bush, House of Saud: The Secret Relationship Between the World's Two Most Powerful Dynasties ISBN 074325337X
  • Bill Sammon, Misunderestimated: The President Battles Terrorism, John Kerry, and the Bush Haters (2004) ISBN 0060723831
  • Richard Miniter, Shadow War: The Untold Story of How Bush Is Winning the War on Terror (2004) ISBN 0895260522

 

Related articles

 

External links

 

Transcripts

Wikiquote has a collection of quotations by or about George W. Bush.


 

Wikisource has original works written by or about George W. Bush.

 

Official and news links

 

Information sites


 

Preceded by:
Bill Clinton
President of the United States
2001–2009
Followed by:
 


 

Preceded by:
Ann Richards
Governor of Texas
1995–2000
Followed by:
Rick Perry


 

Preceded by:
Bob Dole
U.S. Republican Party Presidential Nominees
2000, 2004 (won)
Followed by:
 



 


 

Click here to find out more!
line subscribe
 

 

 
 
 
magazine cover
issue
Search Esquire

 



The Case Against George W. Bush

The son of the fortieth president of the United States takes a hard look at the son of the forty-first and does not like what he sees

By Ron Reagan
September 2004, Volume 142, Issue 3
Illustration by Tim O'Brien

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |

It may have been the guy in the hood teetering on the stool, electrodes clamped to his genitals. Or smirking Lynndie England and her leash. Maybe it was the smarmy memos tapped out by soft-fingered lawyers itching to justify such barbarism. The grudging, lunatic retreat of the neocons from their long-standing assertion that Saddam was in cahoots with Osama didn't hurt. Even the Enron audiotapes and their celebration of craven sociopathy likely played a part. As a result of all these displays and countless smaller ones, you could feel, a couple of months back, as summer spread across the country, the ground shifting beneath your feet. Not unlike that scene in The Day After Tomorrow, then in theaters, in which the giant ice shelf splits asunder, this was more a paradigm shift than anything strictly tectonic. No cataclysmic ice age, admittedly, yet something was in the air, and people were inhaling deeply. I began to get calls from friends whose parents had always voted Republican, "but not this time." There was the staid Zbigniew Brzezinski on the staid NewsHour with Jim Lehrer sneering at the "Orwellian language" flowing out of the Pentagon. Word spread through the usual channels that old hands from the days of Bush the Elder were quietly (but not too quietly) appalled by his son's misadventure in Iraq. Suddenly, everywhere you went, a surprising number of folks seemed to have had just about enough of what the Bush administration was dishing out. A fresh age appeared on the horizon, accompanied by the sound of scales falling from people's eyes. It felt something like a demonstration of that highest of American prerogatives and the most deeply cherished American freedom: dissent.

Oddly, even my father's funeral contributed. Throughout that long, stately, overtelevised week in early June, items would appear in the newspaper discussing the Republicans' eagerness to capitalize (subtly, tastefully) on the outpouring of affection for my father and turn it to Bush's advantage for the fall election. The familiar "Heir to Reagan" puffballs were reinflated and loosed over the proceedings like (subtle, tasteful) Mylar balloons. Predictably, this backfired. People were treated to a side-by-side comparison—Ronald W. Reagan versus George W. Bush—and it's no surprise who suffered for it. Misty-eyed with nostalgia, people set aside old political gripes for a few days and remembered what friend and foe always conceded to Ronald Reagan: He was damned impressive in the role of leader of the free world. A sign in the crowd, spotted during the slow roll to the Capitol rotunda, seemed to sum up the mood—a portrait of my father and the words NOW THERE WAS A PRESIDENT.

The comparison underscored something important. And the guy on the stool, Lynndie, and her grinning cohorts, they brought the word: The Bush administration can't be trusted. The parade of Bush officials before various commissions and committees—Paul Wolfowitz, who couldn't quite remember how many young Americans had been sacrificed on the altar of his ideology; John Ashcroft, lip quivering as, for a delicious, fleeting moment, it looked as if Senator Joe Biden might just come over the table at him—these were a continuing reminder. The Enron creeps, too—a reminder of how certain environments and particular habits of mind can erode common decency. People noticed. A tipping point had been reached. The issue of credibility was back on the table. The L-word was in circulation. Not the tired old bromide liberal. That's so 1988. No, this time something much more potent: liar.

Politicians will stretch the truth. They'll exaggerate their accomplishments, paper over their gaffes. Spin has long been the lingua franca of the political realm. But George W. Bush and his administration have taken "normal" mendacity to a startling new level far beyond lies of convenience. On top of the usual massaging of public perception, they traffic in big lies, indulge in any number of symptomatic small lies, and, ultimately, have come to embody dishonesty itself. They are a lie. And people, finally, have started catching on.

None of this, needless to say, guarantees Bush a one-term presidency. The far-right wing of the country—nearly one third of us by some estimates—continues to regard all who refuse to drink the Kool-Aid (liberals, rationalists, Europeans, et cetera) as agents of Satan. Bush could show up on video canoodling with Paris Hilton and still bank their vote. Right-wing talking heads continue painting anyone who fails to genuflect deeply enough as a "hater," and therefore a nut job, probably a crypto-Islamist car bomber. But these protestations have taken on a hysterical, almost comically desperate tone. It's one thing to get trashed by Michael Moore. But when Nobel laureates, a vast majority of the scientific community, and a host of current and former diplomats, intelligence operatives, and military officials line up against you, it becomes increasingly difficult to characterize the opposition as fringe wackos.

Does anyone really favor an administration that so shamelessly lies? One that so tenaciously clings to secrecy, not to protect the American people, but to protect itself? That so willfully misrepresents its true aims and so knowingly misleads the people from whom it derives its power? I simply cannot think so. And to come to the same conclusion does not make you guilty of swallowing some liberal critique of the Bush presidency, because that's not what this is. This is the critique of a person who thinks that lying at the top levels of his government is abhorrent. Call it the honest guy's critique of George W. Bush.


THE MOST EGREGIOUS EXAMPLES OF distortion and misdirection—which the administration even now cannot bring itself to repudiate—involve our putative "War on Terror" and our subsequent foray into Iraq.




 
 

Photo Credits: Illustration by Tim O'Brien
 

International Issues   
Foreign Policy
Homeland Security
- Missile Defense   
- Military Pay
Iraq
China
Free Trade
- NAFTA & WTO
Immigration
Domestic Issues    
Gun Control
Crime
- Death Penalty  
Drugs
- Alcoholism
Civil Rights
- Gay Rights
Environment
Economic Issues   
Budget & Economy
- Oil & Energy
Government Reform
- Campaign Finance  
Tax Reform
Social Security
Technology
Principles & Values   
- Religion
Social Issues   
Education
- College
School Choice
Welfare
Labor
Health Care
- Medicare & Medicaid  
Abortion
Families & Children
  Newsletter     Signup  
Email:
  
Zip:
    
Or click for More Info.
 

 

 


 

VoteMatch Responses
(Click here for VoteMatch quiz)
VoteMatch Question & Answer
(Click on question for explanation and background)
Based on these stances:
(Click on topic for excerpt & citation)

 

George W. Bush is a Hard-Core Conservative.
Click here for explanation of political philosophy.
Click here for VoteMatch quiz.


                                                                                                                                                                               
 

  



Home | Issues | Candidates | Most Recent Quote | Candidate Grid | Books + Debates | Senate | VoteMatch | The Forum | Policy Papers | News | About Us | Write Us

 
Logo
Copyright 1999-2004
by OnTheIssues.org
Reprinting by permission only.
 
E-mail: issues2002@webmerchants.com
Mail
Send donations or submit quotations to:
On The Issues
1770 Massachusetts Ave. #630
Cambridge, MA 02140
DCOrbit


WM_logo Written by
WebMerchants


IWP_logo Powered by
Instant Web Page

 

Reproduction of material from any OnTheIssues.org pages without written permission is prohibited.
Copyright © 1999-2004 OnTheIssues.org & the SpeakOut Foundation, all rights reserved.
OnTheIssues.org 1770 Massachusetts Ave. #630, Cambridge MA 02140
E-mail us at:info at OnTheIssues.org
| Advertising information | Privacy and Use

2004 Presidential Candidates
George W. Bush
On the issues>>
Profile
The Forum
VoteMatch
President of the United States, Former Republican Governor (TX)

George W. Bush
Dick Cheney

Presidential challengers:

Carol Moseley-Braun
Former Ambassador and Senator
Wesley Clark
NATO general
Howard Dean
Former Vermont Governor
John Edwards
North Carolina Senator
Dick Gephardt
Missouri Congressman
Bob Graham
Florida Senator
John Kerry
Massachusetts Senator
Dennis Kucinich
Ohio Congressman
Joe Lieberman
2000 Vice Presidential nominee
Ralph Nader
2000 Green Party nominee
Al Sharpton
Civil Rights activist

Past & Future Candidates:

Pat Buchanan
2000 Reform Party presidential nominee
Bill Clinton
President of the United States, 1993-2001
Hillary Clinton
New York Senator and former First Lady
Elizabeth Dole
Former Secretary of Transportation & NC Senator
John McCain
Republican presidential challenger
Al Gore
2000 Democratic presidential nominee
Ross Perot
1996 Reform Party presidential nominee
Jesse Ventura
Former Governor of Minnesota

Archives
 



Worse Than Watergate, by John W. Dean

Winning Modern Wars, by Wesley Clark

The Price of Loyalty, by Ron Suskind

Plan of Attack, by Bob Woodward

A Matter of Character, by Ronald Kessler

Bush At War, by Bob Woodward

Against All Enemies, by Richard Clarke

Reports on Abu Ghraib

First Bush-Kerry debate

Second Bush-Kerry debate

Third Bush-Kerry debate

Fact-Check

Ad-Watch

The Right Man, by David Frum

2004 Republican Convention speeches

Speeches on Iraq War

State of the Union address

A Charge To Keep, by George Bush

Presidential debate, Wake Forest U., Winston-Salem NC

Presidential debate, Washington U., St. Louis MO

Blueprint for the Middle Class, Bush's Budget Plan

GOP Debate in West Columbia SC

GOP Debate at Calvin College, Michigan

GOP Debate at UNH-Durham

Bush's 230-page policy outline

Republican Debate in Phoenix, AZ

Republican Debate in New Hampshire

Republican Debate in Des Moines, IA

(click a picture above for excerpts or other books and debates by or about George_W__Bush)

Other Political Leaders
Spencer Abraham
Secretary of Energy
Lamar Alexander
Former Governor of Tennessee
Gary Bauer
Conservative Spokesman
Bill Bradley
Former Senator (D,NJ)
Harry Browne
Libertarian Spokesman
Elizabeth Dole
Former Secretary of Transportation
Dick Gephardt
House Minority Leader (D,MO)
Dennis Hastert
Speaker of the House (R,IL)
Orrin Hatch
Senator (R,UT)
Jesse Helms
Senator (R,NC)
Rick Lazio
Former Congressman (R,NY)
John Kasich
Congressman (R,OH)
Ted Kennedy
Senator (D,MA)
Joe Lieberman
Senator (D,CT)
Trent Lott
Senate Majority Leader (R,MS)
Dan Quayle
Former Vice President
Robert Reich
Former Secretary of Labor
Janet Reno
Former Attornery General
Bob Smith
Senator (R,NH)
Strom Thurmond
President Pro-Tem of the Senate (R,SC)
Donald Trump
Reform Spokesman
Paul Wellstone
Senator (D,MN)

Search this site or the web


 

 

Site search Web search

Issues
Abortion
Budget & Economy
Civil Rights
Corporations
Crime
Drugs
Education
Energy & Oil
Environment
Families & Children
Foreign Policy
Free Trade
Government Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Homeland_Security
Immigration
Infrastructure & Technology
Jobs
Principles & Values
Social Security
Tax Reform
War & Peace
Welfare & Poverty

The Forum (Express your views on the issues)
Abortion
Defense
Drugs
Education
Environment
Families & Children
Foreign Policy
Free Trade & Immigration
Gay Rights
Gun Control
Social Security
Tax Reform
Term Limits

(Express your views on the candidates)
Al Gore
Alan Keyes
Bill Bradley
George W. Bush
Harry Browne
John McCain
Pat Buchanan
Steve Forbes

Site Map
Home
(Main page)
Issues
(Quotations organized by topic)
Leaders
(Quotations organized by politician)
Recent
(Most recent quotation for each person)
Candidate Grid
(Summary by candidate of positions on each topic)
Issue Grid
(Summary by topic of each candidate's positions)
Archives
(Debate and book excerpts)
House of Representatives
(106th & 107th Congress)
Senate
(Senators in 107th Congress)
Senate 2000
(Races for 33 seats)
Governors
(50 incumbents)
Cabinet
(15 Secretaries)
Supreme Court
(9 Justices)
VoteMatch
(Presidential Selector and Political Affiliation 20-question quiz)
The Forum
(Your views on the candidates and the issues)
SpeakOut Issues
(Policy background)
News
(Latest headlines on the Presidential race)
About Us
(About Issues2000.org)
Letters
(Other viewers' letters)
Low-graphics version
(No ads, less Java)
Write Us
(Your feedback to us)

SpeakOut!
Have your opinion counted about the causes and issues you care about.
Take a Survey
Pick your targets and start a petition drive about the causes and issues you care about.
Start a Petition
Sign on to ongoing petitions about the causes and issues you care about.
Sign a Petition
Use a SpeakOut selector to define the choices on the causes and issues you care about.
Use a Selector
Send your own message to the people in charge about the causes and issues you care about.
Send a Message
Read about the issues.
The Issues

Activism Centers

 

Abortion

Animal Rights

Death Penalty

Drugs

Education

Environment

Gay Rights

Gun Control

Napster

Race Relations

Religion & Morality

Technology


 


Policy Background
(Essays on the Issues)
Abortion
Budget & Economy
China
Civil Rights
Crime
Defense
Drugs
Education
Environment
Families & Children
Foreign Policy
Free Trade & Immigration
Government Reform
Gun Control
Health Care
Kosovo
Principles & Values
School Choice
Social Security
Tax Reform
Technology
Welfare & Labor

Amazon Reviews
 



Worse Than Watergate, by John W. Dean

Winning Modern Wars, by Wesley Clark

The Price of Loyalty, by Ron Suskind

Plan of Attack, by Bob Woodward

A Matter of Character, by Ronald Kessler

Bush At War, by Bob Woodward

Against All Enemies, by Richard Clarke

The Right Man, by David Frum

A Charge To Keep, by George Bush

(click a book cover for a review or other books by or about George_W__Bush from Amazon.com)

  
 
International Issues   
Foreign Policy
Homeland Security
- Missile Defense   
- Military Pay
Iraq
China
Free Trade
- NAFTA & WTO
Immigration
Domestic Issues    
Gun Control
Crime
- Death Penalty  
Drugs
- Alcoholism
Civil Rights
- Gay Rights
Environment
Economic Issues   
Budget & Economy
- Oil & Energy
Government Reform
- Campaign Finance  
Tax Reform
Social Security
Technology
Principles & Values   
- Religion
Social Issues   
Education
- College
School Choice
Welfare
Labor
Health Care
- Medicare & Medicaid  
Abortion
Families & Children
  Newsletter     Signup  
Email:
  
Zip:
    
Or click for More Info.
 
George W. Bush on Abortion
Click here for 27 full quotes on Abortion OR 7 older headlines OR other candidates on Abortion OR background on Abortion.
  • Partial birth abortion is a brutal practice to be banned. (Oct 2004)
  • Not going to spend taxpayers' money on abortion. (Oct 2004)
  • First president to fund embryonic stem cell research. (Oct 2004)
  • Kerry voted no on partial-birth abortion ban. (Oct 2004)
  • Must make a place for the unborn child. (Sep 2004)
  • Kerry's abortion stance shows the wrong priorities. (Jul 2004)
  • Supports adult stem-cell research but limits on embryos. (Jun 2003)
  • No funds to international groups that offer abortion. (Jan 2001)
  • Accepts FDA approval of RU-486 but concerned about overuse. (Oct 2000)
  • Ban partial-birth abortions, and reduce abortions overall. (Oct 2000)
  • Approval of RU-486 is wrong. (Sep 2000)
  • Good people can disagree; but let’s value life. (Aug 2000)
  • Every child born and unborn ought to be protected. (Jun 2000)
  • Welcome all children; supports adoption tax credits. (Apr 2000)
  • Supports GOP abortion plank but disagrees on exceptions. (Feb 2000)
  • No Republican will allow partial-birth abortion. (Feb 2000)
  • Ideal: Value every life; but many steps to get there. (Jun 1999)
  • Supports Parental Notification Law for minor girls. (Jun 1999)
  • Ban partial-birth; ban taxpayer funding. (Mar 1999)
  • Encourage fewer abortions via adoption & abstinence. (Jul 1998)

    Supreme Court + Constitution

  • No litmus test except interpretation of the Constitution. (Oct 2004)
  • Prefers strict constructionists, like overturning Dred Scott. (Oct 2004)
  • No litmus test; just strict constructionist interpretation. (Oct 2000)
  • No tax money for abortion, but no Pro-Life Amendment either. (Sep 2000)
  • Supreme Court is wrong: leave abortion to the states. (Jun 2000)
  • No pro-life pledge; VP & judges will simply be qualified. (Jan 2000)
  • Would support - but not pursue - a pro-life Amendment. (Jun 1999)
George W. Bush on Budget & Economy
Click here for 22 full quotes on Budget & Economy OR 18 older headlines OR other candidates on Budget & Economy OR background on Budget & Economy.
  • Pay-as-you-go means you pay, he goes and spends. (Oct 2004)
  • The middle class will have to fill the Kerry tax gap. (Oct 2004)
  • Kerry is not credible as a fiscal conservative. (Oct 2004)
  • Kerry will not be able to pay for $2.2T in new spending. (Oct 2004)
  • Bush ties growing economy to his tax cuts. (Mar 2004)
  • Investment and aid to states will help economy rebound. (Aug 2003)
  • Provides assistance to new small businesses. (Aug 2003)
  • Reframed Clinton from economic prosperity to moral failing. (Jun 2003)
  • Restore consumer confidence with tax cuts & new oil supplies. (Mar 2001)
  • Despite prosperity, “It’s time for a change” in Washington. (Oct 2000)
  • Prosperity results from entrepreneurship & ingenuity. (Oct 2000)
  • Private sector responsible for economic boom. (Aug 2000)
  • Make budget biennial; reinstate line-item veto; target pork. (Jun 2000)
  • $46B in new spending on health, education, & defense. (Apr 2000)
  • New Prosperity Initiative: remove obstacles to advancement. (Apr 2000)
  • Simplify tax code to stimulate economic growth. (Apr 1999)

    Budget Deficit

  • Haven't vetoed any spending bills because we work together. (Oct 2004)
  • Will cut the deficit in half in the next 5 years. (Jan 2004)
  • Fact Check: Deficit didn't exist at end of Clinton term. (Jan 2004)
  • Proposes to shrink federal budget to 16% of GDP. (Mar 2001)
  • Cut national debt by $2T in 10 years; leave $1.2T in debt. (Feb 2001)
  • Too much government spending will end prosperity. (Nov 2000)
George W. Bush on Civil Rights
Click here for 31 full quotes on Civil Rights OR 16 older headlines OR other candidates on Civil Rights OR background on Civil Rights.
  • Local control with consequences if racial profiling occurs. (Oct 2000)
  • $145M over 5 years for disabled transportation. (Jun 2000)
  • Government should promote independence for the disabled. (Jun 2000)
  • Ten Commandments OK in schools for “inherent values”. (Jan 2000)
  • Leave decisions on flying Confederate flag to the states. (Jan 2000)
  • English-plus, not English-only. (Aug 1999)
  • State lottery OK, but qualms about casino gambling. (Jul 1999)
  • Patriot Act does not water down civil liberties. (Oct 2004)
  • Don't let Patriot Act expire-terrorist threat won't. (Jan 2004)
  • On Patriot Act, willing to defy ethnic lobbies. (Jun 2003)

    Affirmative Action

  • Help minority business by unbundling government contracts. (Oct 2004)
  • Minorities benefit from good climate for small business. (Oct 2004)
  • Race-neutral admissions first; race factor ok if that fails. (Aug 2004)
  • Education, housing, and hiring must be equal for all. (May 2004)
  • Affirmative access: qualified candidates guaranteed college. (Oct 2000)
  • Guaranteed TX college racial preference for top 10% of class. (Sep 2000)
  • Affirmative access: end soft bigotry of low expectations. (Aug 2000)
  • For affirmative action, but not quotas or preferences. (Apr 2000)
  • Reach out to minorities, but without quotas. (Jun 1999)

    Gay Rights

  • Don't know whether homosexuality is a choice. (Oct 2004)
  • We shouldn't change our views on the sanctity of marriage. (Oct 2004)
  • Protect marriage against activist judges. (Sep 2004)
  • Bush calls for constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage. (Feb 2004)
  • Instinct on gay issues: do not touch them. (Jun 2003)
  • Offices on AIDS and race will remain open. (Feb 2001)
  • Bush claims gay tolerance but record differs. (Oct 2000)
  • Tolerance & equal rights, not gay marriage & special rights. (Oct 2000)
  • No gay adoptions; but listens to gay GOP group. (Apr 2000)
  • Against gay marriage, but leave it to the states. (Feb 2000)
  • No gays in Boy Scouts. (Aug 1999)
  • Hate-crime rules don’t apply to gays. (Jul 1999)
George W. Bush on Corporations
Click here for 8 full quotes on Corporations OR other candidates on Corporations OR background on Corporations.
  • FactCheck: Bush indeed is half-owner of timber company. (Oct 2004)
  • FactCheck: Kerry plan affects 471,000 companies, not 900,000. (Oct 2004)
  • Kerry will tax small businesses. (Oct 2004)
  • Enron news hit White House like a death in the family. (Jun 2003)
  • Enron donated $1M to GOP & advised Bush on energy plan. (Feb 2002)
  • Federal government should stay out of the marketplace. (Dec 1999)
  • Stop hurting business with excessive punitive damage awards. (Dec 1999)
  • More job training; R&D tax credits. (Jul 1998)
George W. Bush on Crime
Click here for 24 full quotes on Crime OR 20 older headlines OR other candidates on Crime OR background on Crime.
  • America is the land of the second chance. (Jan 2004)
  • Ignored Byrd hate crime bill despite plea by Byrd’s family. (Oct 2000)
  • National hate crimes law OK, stricter enforcement better. (Oct 2000)
  • Limit frivolous lawsuits to create entrepreneurial heaven. (Dec 1999)
  • “Tough-love” in strictly disciplined juvenile boot camps. (Dec 1999)
  • For tough juvenile justice laws. (Jun 1999)
  • Criminal rehabilitation by Prison Ministry after release. (Jun 1999)
  • Increased penalties to rehabilitate juveniles. (May 1999)
  • Supports trying minors as adults for violent crimes. (Dec 1998)

    Death Penalty

  • Not proud that Texas has most executions. (Oct 2000)
  • Death penalty for deterrence, not revenge. (Oct 2000)
  • Death penalty decisions are profound, but made in 15 minutes. (Oct 2000)
  • Death penalty for hate crimes like any other murder. (Oct 2000)
  • Uphold law on death penalty; and think of the victims. (Jun 2000)
  • 134 Texas executions are “fair and just”. (Jun 2000)
  • Use DNA evidence for death penalty cases. (Jun 2000)
  • Death penalty clemency for bad process, not for repentance. (Jan 2000)

    Mandatory Sentencing

  • Miranda should be waived in some situations. (Jun 2000)
  • Proud of eliminating parole for violent criminals. (Dec 1999)
  • Track gangs; enact automatic sentencing. (Jan 1999)
  • Supports “two strikes” & registration for sexual criminals. (Dec 1998)
  • Supports victim notification laws and anti-stalking laws. (Dec 1998)
  • More searches and less parole for criminals. (Jan 1997)
  • Mandatory sentencing for repeat offenders. (Feb 1995)
George W. Bush on Drugs
Click here for 25 full quotes on Drugs OR 3 older headlines OR other candidates on Drugs OR background on Drugs.
  • Aggressive drug education, treatment & enforcement. (Jan 2004)
  • $23 million more for drug-testing in schools. (Jan 2004)
  • Use of performance-enhancing steroids sends wrong message. (Jan 2004)
  • $600M plan help 300,000 addicts via vouchers. (Aug 2003)
  • Use faith-based programs for addicted Americans. (Aug 2003)
  • Turned from alcoholism by power of prayer. (Jun 2003)
  • $2.8B more for Drug War, for state treatment & abroad. (Oct 2000)
  • Clinton-Gore drug policy is inconsistent and has failed. (Oct 2000)
  • Feds must help border counties fight drug traffickers. (Jun 2000)
  • Supports military package to Colombia to fight drug supply. (Mar 2000)
  • Stronger penalties for first time cocaine possession. (Mar 2000)
  • Full background checks on drug use for all appointees. (Aug 1999)
  • Parents make up for past by warning kids against drugs. (Aug 1999)
  • Supports tough drug laws as well as drug education programs. (Dec 1998)

    Alcoholism

  • Arrested for drunk driving, plead guilty, paid fine. (Aug 2004)
  • A "carefree lad" who drank but never did drugs. (Aug 2004)
  • Spiritual reawakening ended beer and bourbon consumption. (Aug 2004)
  • Changed license in 1995 to avoid DUI arrest disclosure. (Nov 2000)
  • Acknowledges arrest for drunk driving in 1976. (Nov 2000)
  • Quit drinking when alcohol started to compete with family. (Sep 2000)
  • Identifies with former addicts based on former alcoholism. (Jan 2000)
  • Did not use drugs for the last 25 years. (Aug 1999)
  • Encourages abstinence from tobacco, drugs or alcohol. . (Dec 1998)
  • More federal funding for all aspects of Drug War. (Aug 2000)
  • Rated F by VOTE-HEMP, indicating an anti-hemp voting record. (Dec 2003)
George W. Bush on Education
Click here for 75 full quotes on Education OR 43 older headlines OR other candidates on Education OR background on Education.
  • Reading is the new civil right. (Oct 2004)
  • Required Texas schools to teach phonics over whole language. (Aug 2004)
  • No Child Left Behind Act implements phonics nationally. (Aug 2004)
  • Progressing towards excellence for every child. (Jan 2004)
  • Jobs for the 21st Century: more high school help. (Jan 2004)
  • Reading First program successful. (Aug 2003)
  • Public schools are America's great hope. (Aug 2003)
  • Teaching to the Test is good, if testing basics. (Feb 2001)
  • Time for real reform, not work around the edges. (Jan 2001)
  • Commitments: testing; local control; federal help; options. (Jan 2001)
  • Poor kids can’t read; now is the time to teach them. (Aug 2000)
  • End the soft bigotry of low expectations in our schools. (Aug 2000)
  • “Silver Scholarships” for kids from seniors who volunteer. (May 2000)
  • Character education grants & American Youth Character Awards. (Apr 2000)
  • Zero tolerance on disruption, guns, & school safety. (Apr 2000)
  • ‘Reading First’ confronts a national emergency. (Mar 2000)
  • Freedom & flexibility in return for high standards & results. (Feb 2000)
  • If poor kids don’t learn, give school funds to parents. (Dec 1999)
  • Leave no child behind: reform Title I & Head Start. (Oct 1999)
  • Evolution & creationism both valid; let states decide. (Aug 1999)
  • Teachers’ unions obstacle to school innovation. (Apr 1999)
  • Teach values and moral responsibility in schools. (Apr 1998)

    Accountability

  • Raise standards and focus on results for our schools. (Sep 2004)
  • Pushed standardized testing as a top legislative priority. (Aug 2004)
  • "No Child Left Behind" increases accountability. (Aug 2003)
  • Local control is core principle of successful education. (Aug 2003)
  • TX test score improvements not reflected on national tests. (Oct 2000)
  • Focus on responsibility and parents, not on federal spending. (Oct 2000)
  • Improve education with local control, accountability. (Sep 2000)
  • Hold schools accountable and teach character. (Sep 2000)
  • If you get federal money, you must return measurements. (May 2000)
  • Test every grade every year & publish results. (Apr 2000)
  • Link block grants & vouchers to student testing. (Feb 2000)
  • State should enforce standards, not micromanage schools. (Dec 1999)
  • Develop tests locally - no national tests. (Dec 1999)
  • Help failing students pass - without social promotion. (Mar 1999)

    College

  • We've increased Pell Grants by a million students. (Oct 2004)
  • Community college provides the skills to people to fill jobs. (Oct 2004)
  • $25B over 10 years for reading, Pell Grants, & charters. (Oct 2000)
  • $1.5B for state merit scholarships to college. (Aug 2000)
  • $275M for pre-paid college tuition tax credits. (Aug 2000)
  • $1.3B to help students in college-prep math & science. (Jun 2000)

    Education Spending

  • Only a liberal would say 49% more funding isn't enough. (Oct 2004)
  • Will fund early intervention programs to help high-schoolers. (Sep 2004)
  • $5,000 Grants for poor students in math & sciences. (May 2004)
  • Fact Check: NCLB increased school funding, but shy by $5.4B. (Jan 2004)
  • Increased per-student funding by almost 60%. (Aug 2003)
  • Increased school funding by $11B since taking office. (Aug 2003)
  • Feds give 6% of money; but 60% for “paperwork-filler-outer”. (Oct 2000)
  • $900M to improve Indian schools. (Aug 2000)
  • $400M more for after-school programs, via block grants. (Jul 2000)
  • $5B reading program; mixing phonics & literature. (Apr 2000)
  • $2B for teachers; mandates are optional. (Apr 2000)
  • $400 deductible when teachers spend own money on classrooms. (Apr 2000)
  • Expand Education Savings Accounts to $5000 per year. (Oct 1999)

    School Choice

  • Give options for kids trapped in failing schools. (Aug 2003)
  • Increased funding to $200M for charter schools. (Aug 2003)
  • Favors rigorous testing over school choice. (Jun 2003)
  • Parents & children must have other options when schools fail. (Jan 2001)
  • Pushes OPTIONS for private schools; without saying VOUCHERS. (Jan 2001)
  • Vouchers are up to states; allow local control. (Oct 2000)
  • Allow “charter states” as well as charter schools. (Sep 2000)
  • One size does not fit all in education. (Aug 2000)
  • Money from failed schools can go to charters or tutors too. (May 2000)
  • Tax money to religious schools OK, if they’re teaching kids. (May 2000)
  • Profit-making schools OK, as long as kids learn. (May 2000)
  • Fund 2,000 charter schools; defund failing schools. (Apr 2000)
  • Don’t subsidize problems in schools; solve them. (Mar 2000)
  • If schools fail for 3 years, funding becomes “portable”. (Feb 2000)
  • $3 billion for Charter School Fund. (Oct 1999)
  • School decisions by parents, not federal judges. (Aug 1999)
  • Let poor people choose their schools, like rich people do. (Aug 1999)
  • Supports vouchers, including private or religious schools. (Dec 1998)
  • Vouchers tied to “accountability system”. (Mar 1998)
  • “Home rule” with state standards. (Feb 1995)
George W. Bush on Energy & Oil
Click here for 29 full quotes on Energy & Oil OR 9 older headlines OR other candidates on Energy & Oil OR background on Energy & Oil.
  • O'Neill: Industry overruled environment in energy taskforce. (Jan 2004)
  • Energy plan is about reducing oil imports, not cheap energy. (Jun 2003)
  • Incentives for high-mileage cars, but drill for more oil. (May 2001)
  • More exploration, more nuclear, more energy research. (May 2001)
  • Make Amtrak more efficient and competitive. (Sep 2000)
  • Natural gas is hemispheric; find it in our own neighborhood. (Feb 2001)
  • Clarify rules to allow for more nuclear power generation. (Oct 2000)
  • Better to drill ANWR than import oil from Saddam Hussein. (Oct 2000)
  • Replenish energy supplies with new domestic coal & pipelines. (Oct 2000)
  • Use ANWR fees for alternative energy and home oil help. (Oct 2000)
  • Look for oil in US rather than tap into emergency reserves. (Sep 2000)
  • Remove federal impediments to states’ clean energy. (Sep 2000)
  • Explore ANWR; explore for gas; reduce foreign dependence. (Jan 2000)
  • Wean from oil, via electric deregulation & natural gas. (Dec 1999)

    Global Warming

  • The Kyoto Treaty would have cost America a lot of jobs. (Oct 2004)
  • Kyoto Treaty is the "emperor with no clothes". (Aug 2004)
  • $1.7 billion program will make hydrogen cars common by 2020. (Jan 2004)
  • Energy production overrules CO2 emissions. (Jan 2004)
  • $1.2B to develop hydrogen fuel via private partnerships. (Aug 2003)
  • Reduce greenhouse gas intensity by 18% over next decade. (Aug 2003)
  • Rejected CO2 trading permits as solution to global warming. (Jun 2003)
  • Solution to global warming is safe & clean nuclear power. (Jun 2003)
  • Abandons campaign pledge to reduce CO2 emissions. (Mar 2001)
  • CO2 is not a pollutant under CAA; no emission caps. (Feb 2001)
  • Scientists are unsure about global warming. (Oct 2000)
  • Kyoto Treaty puts too much burden on US. (Oct 2000)
  • Opposes Kyoto treaty, ESA, & other intrusive regulations. (Nov 1999)
  • Voluntary partnerships reduce greenhouse gases economically. (Aug 2000)
  • Kyoto Treaty must include reductions by all countries. (Aug 2000)
George W. Bush on Environment
Click here for 21 full quotes on Environment OR 12 older headlines OR other candidates on Environment OR background on Environment.
  • Proposed different measures to improve the environment. (Oct 2004)
  • Clear Skies Initiative improves air quality now. (Aug 2003)
  • Restrict wetland development, but not arsenic or CO2. (Apr 2001)
  • More lead emission reporting requirements. (Apr 2001)
  • Weaken Clean Air; no comment on Clean Water. (Nov 2000)
  • Incentives for private land stewardship & conservation. (Jun 2000)
  • Conservation partnerships to protect lands & watersheds. (Jun 2000)
  • $60M for private stewardship; tax break on conservation land. (Jun 2000)
  • Superfund failing: too costly; too litigious; too complex. (Apr 2000)
  • Keep drilling; keep dams; keep private property. (Apr 2000)

    Brownfields + Parks

  • Proposes $211M to cleaning up brownfields. (Aug 2003)
  • $450M annually for wildlife and open spaces. (Sep 2000)
  • $4.9B to repair “crumbling” national parks. (Sep 2000)
  • Reinvest in Conservation Fund; repair parks & refuges. (Apr 2000)

    Federal Role

  • Good stewardship is personal responsibility and public value. (Aug 2003)
  • Natural resources & environment funding in FY04 highest ever. (Aug 2003)
  • Federal standards+local collaboration; no command & control. (Oct 2000)
  • Replace mandate/regulate/litigate with decentralized efforts. (Sep 2000)
  • Can’t sue our way to clean air & water--work with industry. (Apr 2000)
  • Keep fed enviro role but give money & flexibility to states. (Apr 2000)
  • Base enviro decisions on science & market-driven solutions. (Apr 2000)
George W. Bush on Families & Children
Click here for 22 full quotes on Families & Children OR 12 older headlines OR other candidates on Families & Children OR background on Families & Children.
  • Defend the institution of marriage against activist judges. (Jan 2004)
  • New relief plans focus on the American family. (Aug 2003)
  • Tax cut plan helps single people as well as families. (Nov 2000)
  • Internet filters, ratings, & parental monitoring for kids. (Oct 2000)
  • Paying taxes hurts family time for middle class. (Sep 2000)
  • Blueprint: Focus on community; adoption; fatherhood; safety. (Sep 2000)
  • Safety at school & home: Project Sentry & Project ChildSafe. (Sep 2000)
  • Teach our children the values that defeat violence. (Aug 2000)
  • Fathers’ registry will promote involvement, responsibility. (Jul 2000)
  • $75M to support veterans to mentor youth. (Jul 2000)
  • $2.3 billion over 5 years for adoption & child welfare. (Jul 2000)
  • Parental accountability is more important than trigger locks. (Mar 2000)
  • Leave no child behind, via improving schools & health care. (Jan 2000)
  • More daycare funds; caseworkers; “Second Chance” homes. (Jun 1999)
  • V-chip OK, but cultural changes are better. (May 1999)
  • Filter - or avoid - media that romanticizes violence. (Apr 1999)
  • Enforce child protection and child support. (Jan 1999)

    Abstinence

  • Double funding for abstinence to prevent STDs. (Jan 2004)
  • Promote abstinence in schools and via churches. (Apr 2000)
  • Abstinence Ed should get funded as much as Sex Ed. (Jun 1999)
  • Appropriate to draw a moral line for children. (Jun 1999)
  • Teach kids right (abstinence) and wrong (drugs & gangs). (Apr 1998)
George W. Bush on Foreign Policy
Click here for 60 full quotes on Foreign Policy OR 22 older headlines OR other candidates on Foreign Policy OR background on Foreign Policy.
  • Made unpopular decisions for great American values. (Oct 2004)
  • Allies are dealing with Iran and North Korea with America. (Oct 2004)
  • Free nations will help us achieve the peace we all want. (Sep 2004)
  • We ought to be working with the African Union. (Sep 2004)
  • US establishes UN Democracy Fund. (Sep 2004)
  • Allies deserve the respect of all Americans. (Sep 2004)
  • Foreign affairs is interpersonal leadership, not knowledge. (Aug 2004)
  • Full transition to democratic Iraq by Jan. 2005. (May 2004)
  • National Endowment for Democracy in the Middle East. (Jan 2004)
  • Tilt back toward Israel. (Jan 2004)
  • Vietnam: Trade better for human rights than sanctions. (Oct 2000)
  • Supported force in Mideast & Balkans, not Haiti & Somalia. (Oct 2000)
  • Africa’s important but not a priority; no nation-building. (Oct 2000)
  • Keep troops in Korea & NATO; not in Haiti & Balkans. (Oct 2000)
  • Puerto Rico: Back statehood if majority votes for it. (Sep 2000)
  • Will keep sanctions against Cuba. (Aug 2000)
  • US will be a friend to Latin American democracies. (Aug 2000)
  • Patrol borders, but also invest in Latin America. (Aug 2000)
  • Africa: Rally world to help AIDS, but not with US funds. (Jan 2000)
  • Mexico: Free trade, but with more border patrols. (Oct 1998)

    China

  • Six-party talks are better than taking on North Korea alone. (Sep 2004)
  • The six-party talks will unwind when we have bilateral talks. (Sep 2004)
  • Must have China's leverage on Kim Jong Il. (Sep 2004)
  • Abandoned ambiguity with China to horror of own diplomats. (Jun 2003)
  • Do “whatever it takes” to defend Taiwan, including military. (Apr 2001)
  • Maintain relations with both Taiwan & China. (Apr 2000)
  • Defend Taiwan if China violates one-China policy. (Mar 2000)
  • No strategic ambiguity: US will defend Taiwan against China. (Feb 2000)
  • China is an American competitor, not a friend. (Feb 2000)
  • Entrepreneurial China trade differs from totalitarian Cuba. (Jan 2000)
  • China’s taste of freedom encourages capitalism’s growth. (Dec 1999)
  • China: Reaction to espionage was not serious and not enough. (May 1999)
  • Cox Report warrants review of all export controls to China. (May 1999)

    Internationalism

  • Kerry wants a global test while I will be resolute. (Oct 2004)
  • Won't allow foreigners to make national security decisions. (Oct 2004)
  • Other nations are sacrificing with us. (Oct 2004)
  • Hope we never have to take preemptive military action. (Sep 2004)
  • Take preemptive action in order to make America secure. (Sep 2004)
  • No “global test”: protect Americans even if unpopular abroad. (Sep 2004)
  • America will never seek a permission slip for self-defense. (Jan 2004)
  • Bush Doctrine: pre-emptive strikes for US defense. (Dec 2003)
  • Help poor countries around the world. (Aug 2003)
  • United States returning to UNESCO. (Sep 2002)
  • Bush compromises between internationalists and isolationists. (Oct 2000)
  • US should humbly empower other countries, not dictate. (Oct 2000)
  • America should be a humble nation, but project strength. (Oct 2000)
  • Vital interests: US or allies threatened; we can win & exit. (Oct 2000)
  • US troops will never be under UN command. (Oct 2000)
  • Less intervention abroad and unilateral nuclear cuts at home. (Sep 2000)
  • Reform UN & IMF; strengthen NATO. (Apr 2000)
  • Brokering peace requires diligence and patience. (Mar 2000)
  • America should speak loudly and carry a big stick. (Dec 1999)
  • America should act as the leader of the free world. (Dec 1999)
  • Foreign policy with a touch of iron & a sharpened sword. (Nov 1999)

    Russia

  • Continue working with Putin in the future. (Sep 2004)
  • Focus on Russia as part of Europe. (Jun 2003)
  • Russia nukes: demand inventory; pay for dismantling. (Apr 2000)
  • Russia funding: replace IMF loans with $ to people. (Apr 2000)
  • Pressure Russia financially to ease up on Chechnya. (Apr 2000)
  • Focus on Big Three: Russia, China, & India. (Dec 1999)
George W. Bush on Free Trade
Click here for 13 full quotes on Free Trade OR 13 older headlines OR other candidates on Free Trade OR background on Free Trade.
  • Fact Check: Free trade tempered by steel protectionism. (Jan 2004)
  • Tariffs over free trade, for steel industry. (Jan 2004)
  • Repeals steel tariffs he imposed in 2002. (Dec 2003)
  • Don’t link trade to environment and labor. (Sep 2000)
  • Sow free trade and farmers will reap. (Jan 2000)
  • A free market promotes dreams and individuality. (Dec 1999)
  • Import fees are not the answer to foreign competition. (Dec 1999)
  • The fearful build walls; the confident demolish them. (Jun 1999)

    NAFTA + WTO

  • Establish Free Trade Area of the Americas by 2005. (Apr 2001)
  • Add Chile, Brazil, Argentina, & others to NAFTA. (Oct 2000)
  • No trade barriers from Alaska to the tip of Cape Horn. (Apr 2000)
  • Fast Track in west; WTO in east. (Apr 2000)
  • Supports Fast Track; WTO; NAFTA; anti-dumping. (Apr 2000)
George W. Bush on Government Reform
Click here for 21 full quotes on Government Reform OR 18 older headlines OR other candidates on Government Reform OR background on Government Reform.
  • FactCheck: Kerry authored 7 bills, not 5 that Bush claims. (Oct 2004)
  • Loves government, but keep it restricted. (Mar 2001)
  • Big government cannot be compassionate. (Nov 2000)
  • Regulatory style: like Reagan, get government out of the way. (Oct 2000)
  • We believe in people; they believe in government. (Oct 2000)
  • Make govt citizen-centered, results-oriented & market-based. (Jun 2000)
  • Restore cooperation with Congress, to accomplish more. (Jun 2000)
  • Pay for tax cuts with cash, not corporate loopholes. (Jan 2000)
  • Meet basic priorities, & return leftovers to taxpayers. (Jan 2000)
  • No legislating from the bench-judges should just interpret. (Jan 2000)
  • Term limits for state representatives and governors. (Jul 1998)
  • Reform the court system to serve people, not lawyers. (Feb 2000)
  • Favors Tort Reform to make it harder to sue corporations. (Oct 1999)
  • No lawsuits on good-faith acts. (Jun 1999)

    Campaign Finance Reform

  • Private soft money OK, with full & prompt disclosure. (Mar 2001)
  • Ban soft money, but no public financing of elections. (Oct 2000)
  • Ban some soft money; fewer restrictions on individuals. (Sep 2000)
  • No government takeover of campaign finance. (Mar 2000)
  • Full disclosure and no giving limits. (Mar 2000)
  • No corporate or union soft money. (Feb 2000)
  • Supports tweaking campaign finance rules. (Jul 1999)
George W. Bush on Gun Control
Click here for 19 full quotes on Gun Control OR 5 older headlines OR other candidates on Gun Control OR background on Gun Control.
  • Make America safer by prosecuting criminals with guns. (Oct 2004)
  • If gun laws are broken, hold people accountable. (Oct 2000)
  • First, enforce the law; then keep guns from wrong people. (Oct 2000)
  • Restrict lawsuits against gun makers. (Sep 2000)
  • Government should pay for voluntary trigger locks. (May 2000)
  • Project Sentry: juvenile gun laws & school accountability. (Apr 2000)
  • Avoid Columbine via gun control, values & character ed. (Apr 2000)
  • Would sign, but would not push, gun restrictions. (Apr 2000)
  • Ban automatic weapons & high-capacity ammunition clips. (Apr 2000)
  • More laws & enforcement on juveniles with guns. (Apr 2000)
  • Best gun control is more prosecution & certain jail. (Dec 1999)
  • Supports gun ownership for protection and hunting. (Dec 1999)
  • Raise legal age for guns to 21; ban certain ammo. (Aug 1999)
  • No child-safety locks on guns; concealed carrying ok. (Jun 1999)
  • Arrest for guns in school; track juvenile offenders. (Jun 1999)
  • No city lawsuits against gun manufacturers. (Jun 1999)
  • Gun restrictions OK within basic right to own guns. (May 1999)
  • Gun show checks OK; ban guns near schools & kids. (Apr 1999)
  • Assault weapon OK; waiting period not OK. (Apr 1999)
George W. Bush on Health Care
Click here for 65 full quotes on Health Care OR 26 older headlines OR other candidates on Health Care OR background on Health Care.
  • FactCheck: British blocked flu vaccine, not Bush. (Oct 2004)
  • I haven't gotten a flu shot, and I don't intend to. (Oct 2004)
  • Kerry's health care plan is an empty promise. (Oct 2004)
  • The US healthcare system is the envy of the world. (Oct 2004)
  • Veterans are getting very good health care. (Oct 2004)
  • FactCheck: Kerry's plan doesn't put bureaucrats in control. (Oct 2004)
  • Double the NIH budget to $28 billion. (Oct 2004)
  • Kerry's healthcare plan will ruin the quality of healthcare. (Oct 2004)
  • $15B for international AIDS treatment. (Sep 2004)
  • Will enroll millions of poor children in health programs. (Sep 2004)
  • Government-run health care is the wrong prescription. (Jan 2004)
  • Endorses billions more in health care funding. (Aug 2003)
  • Senior Rx: “Immediate Helping Hand” now; more later. (Jan 2001)
  • Absolutely opposed to a national health care plan. (Oct 2000)
  • Medical Savings Accounts part of affordable access & choice. (Oct 2000)
  • Claims of immediate help are only true for poorer families. (Oct 2000)
  • Invest $27B in NIH to cure Alzheimer’s & other diseases. (Sep 2000)
  • Government HMOs not the answer for Social Security. (Sep 2000)
  • Family Health Credit: pay for 90% of basic low-income policy. (Apr 2000)
  • $3.6B for 1,200 new community health centers. (Apr 2000)
  • Expand and Reform Medical Savings Accounts:. (Apr 2000)
  • Opposes doctor assisted suicide. (Apr 2000)
  • Restrict teenage smoking by tough state & federal laws. (Mar 2000)
  • Health insurance for kids from tobacco settlement. (Jun 1999)
  • More funding for disability assistance. (Jun 2000)

    Insurance coverage

  • Allow small firms to join together to purchase insurance. (Sep 2004)
  • Health savings accounts with choice of coverage. (Jan 2004)
  • 100% tax deduction for catastrophic health insurance. (Jan 2004)
  • Everyone should be able to choose a health plan. (Aug 2003)
  • Lift restrictions on Medical Savings Accounts. (Aug 2003)
  • Ask “are we getting health care?” not “are we uninsured?”. (Oct 2000)
  • Link small businesses together in large insurance pools. (Oct 2000)
  • Cover 3 million uninsured at a 10-year cost of $135 billion. (Sep 2000)
  • Small business health insurance via trade associations. (Apr 2000)
  • More CHIPs; more multistate HMOs. (Apr 2000)
  • New Prosperity Initiative: $2,000 health ins. tax credit. (Apr 2000)

    Medicare + Medicaid

  • We got Medicare reform done. (Oct 2004)
  • Medicare bill uses market-based solutions to reduce costs. (Aug 2004)
  • Medicare Rx plan: immediate help, then senior choice. (Oct 2000)
  • Cap senior prescription costs at $6,000 per year. (Sep 2000)
  • $158B for Medicare prescriptions & subsidized premiums. (Sep 2000)
  • Choice of Medicare, free equivalent, or adding own $. (Sep 2000)
  • Second bill to Congress: $48B for immediate Rx help. (Sep 2000)
  • All seniors entitled to Medicare; poor seniors subsidized. (Sep 2000)
  • $7.4B for nursing home insurance via tax deductions. (May 2000)
  • Replace 132,000-page Medicare document with senior choice. (Jan 2000)

    Patient Rights

  • Supports passage of Patient's Bill of Rights. (Aug 2003)
  • Patient Rights: No gatekeepers for gynecologists. (Oct 2000)
  • Give seniors choice, not bureaucrats; give incentives too. (Sep 2000)
  • Health care access via empowerment, not nationalizing. (Apr 2000)
  • Private alternatives & state reforms come first. (Apr 2000)
  • HMOs should cover emergency room; & gynecology directly. (Mar 2000)
  • Create Review Board to hear HMO complaints. (Dec 1999)

    Prescription Drugs

  • FactCheck: Bush opposed drug reimports, but so did Clinton. (Oct 2004)
  • FactCheck: Only 19% of poor seniors use Drug Discount cards. (Oct 2004)
  • Make sure the drugs from Canada cure and don't kill you. (Oct 2004)
  • Senior Rx coverage without government dictates. (Aug 2003)
  • Give states money to help poor seniors buy medicine. (Oct 2000)
  • Medicare Rx drug coverage for low-income seniors. (Mar 2000)

    Tort Reform

  • Flu vaccine shortage from litigation worries. (Oct 2004)
  • Lack of market forces and lawsuits increase healthcare costs. (Oct 2004)
  • FactCheck: Frivolous lawsuits do not cost government $28B. (Oct 2004)
  • Pass medical liability reform to make health care affordable. (Sep 2004)
  • Lower care costs; reform taxes; limit lawsuits. (Jul 1998)
  • Protect state tobacco settlement funds from federal seizure. (Apr 1999)
George W. Bush on Homeland Security
Click here for 49 full quotes on Homeland Security OR 23 older headlines OR other candidates on Homeland Security OR background on Homeland Security.
  • We are not going to have a draft. (Oct 2004)
  • We've tripled the homeland security budget. (Oct 2004)
  • Decreased funding for dealing with nuclear proliferation. (Sep 2004)
  • Bush’s stated military service record is incorrect. (Oct 2000)
  • AWOL in Air Guard? Maybe not, but didn’t meet obligations. (Oct 2000)
  • Opposed Somalia intervention when it became nation-building. (Oct 2000)
  • Be world’s peacemaker instead of world’s policeman. (Oct 2000)
  • Rebuild military so it can fulfill mission to prevent war. (Oct 2000)
  • Bush says military not ready; Pentagon disagrees. (Aug 2000)
  • Post-Vietnam: just cause; clear goal; overwhelming victory. (Aug 2000)
  • Lowest possible number of nukes consistent with security. (May 2000)
  • Use arms to defend Europe, Far East, Mideast, & Panama. (Feb 2000)
  • US military is key to preserving world peace. (Apr 1998)

    Military Personnel

  • Increased military pay by 4% per year. (Aug 2003)
  • $400M for renovating and improving military housing. (Aug 2003)
  • Focus on mobility and swiftness, not size of military. (Feb 2001)
  • Spend money on soldiers before sending them to hot spots. (Oct 2000)
  • Gays in military OK; “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” OK. (Sep 2000)
  • Better equipment, better training, and better pay. (Aug 2000)
  • $1B more for salary; $20B more for R&D for new weapons. (May 2000)

    Missile Defense

  • Missile defense protects America. (Sep 2004)
  • Missile defense for security, not for military advantage. (Aug 2003)
  • Withdrew from ABM Treaty; now $9B for missile defense. (Aug 2003)
  • Listens to Europeans on SDI, but “intent on the right thing”. (Jun 2001)
  • The defenses we build must protect us all: include allies. (Feb 2001)
  • SDI: think beyond Cold War, but convince Europe & Russia. (Aug 2000)
  • Post-Cold War: remove weapons & high-alert; build SDI. (May 2000)
  • Russia: jointly reduce missiles; but no joint SDI. (May 2000)
  • SDI needed for defense against rogue states & terrorists. (May 2000)

    War on Terror

  • FactCheck: Bush initially opposed dept. of homeland security. (Oct 2004)
  • Saddam Hussein now sits in a prison cell and we are safer. (Sep 2004)
  • Stay on the offensive and spread liberty to defeat terrorism. (Sep 2004)
  • Make sure we keep weapons out of the hands of Al Qaida. (Sep 2004)
  • We have to be right 100 percent of the time to fight terror. (Sep 2004)
  • We have tripled the amount of money on homeland security. (Sep 2004)
  • You cannot change positions in the War on Terror. (Sep 2004)
  • Win the war on terror by spreading freedom. (Sep 2004)
  • Bush says Geneva Convention doesn't apply to war on terror. (Aug 2004)
  • Clarke: Bush wants homeland security but did not fund it. (Mar 2004)
  • It's false hope to think that terror is behind us. (Jan 2004)
  • Terrorists declared war on us-terrorism is beyond a crime. (Jan 2004)
  • Concedes no evidence of Saddam ties to 9-11. (Sep 2003)
  • Created "Ready campaign" and Ready.Gov. (Aug 2003)
  • Initiated reorganization of homeland defense. (Aug 2003)
  • Increased security of critical infrastructure. (Aug 2003)
  • "Axis of Evil" means US uses strength without remorse. (Jun 2003)
  • Pro-Muslim post-9-11 message failed. (Jun 2003)
  • Largest increase in defense $ in two decades: never too high. (Jan 2002)
  • Deter terrorists by counterstrikes & counterintelligence. (Apr 2000)
George W. Bush on Immigration
Click here for 15 full quotes on Immigration OR 2 older headlines OR other candidates on Immigration OR background on Immigration.
  • Temporary workers ok, but no amnesty. (Oct 2004)
  • A time-limited worker card for the illegal immigrants. (Oct 2004)
  • Don't believe we ought to have amnesty. (Oct 2004)
  • Support temporary worker program but oppose amnesty. (Jan 2004)
  • New temporary worker program includes illegal aliens. (Jan 2004)
  • Mexico: immigration reform in exchange for oil development. (Jun 2003)
  • Respect other languages, but teach all children English. (Nov 2000)
  • $500M to cut INS application time to 6 months. (Jul 2000)
  • Welcome Latinos; immigration is not a problem to be solved. (Jun 2000)
  • Make INS more “immigrant friendly”. (Jun 2000)
  • High tech: More H-1B worker visas; less export controls. (Apr 2000)
  • Farm policy: Open markets abroad; more H-2A worker visas. (Apr 2000)
  • Latinos enrich us; family values go past Rio Grande. (Feb 2000)
  • More border guards to compassionately turn away Mexicans. (Dec 1999)
  • Guest workers, maybe; citizenship waiting period, yes. (Aug 1999)
George W. Bush on Jobs
Click here for 16 full quotes on Jobs OR other candidates on Jobs OR background on Jobs.

    Farm Policy

  • Farm bill provides $40B over 10 years for conservation. (Aug 2003)
  • Don’t use food as a diplomatic weapon; it hurts farmers. (Oct 2000)
  • Keep Freedom to Farm Act: cut price supports. (Sep 2000)
  • Farm policy: emergency relief; insurance; antitrust. (Apr 2000)
  • Family farms: Food for Peace instead of food as a weapon. (Jan 2000)
  • Ethanol tax incentives good for farmers and good for air. (Nov 1999)

    Labor

  • FactCheck: Bush lost 1.6M PRIVATE jobs, gained some in gov't. (Oct 2004)
  • Education is the best way to create jobs. (Oct 2004)
  • To keep jobs in US, develop energy and keep taxes low. (Oct 2004)
  • Will double the workforce for our job training program. (Sep 2004)
  • Will change outdated labor laws to offer comp-time. (Sep 2004)
  • Dedicated to improving economy through job growth. (Aug 2003)
  • Passed 13 week extension of unemployment benefits. (Aug 2003)
  • Not satisfied until everyone who wants a job can find one. (Aug 2003)
  • Flex-time & family-oriented work rules via tax code. (Oct 2000)
  • Tax breaks, child care & bus fare for working recipients. (Jul 1998)
George W. Bush on Principles & Values
Click here for 71 full quotes on Principles & Values OR 51 older headlines OR other candidates on Principles & Values OR background on Principles & Values.
  • Kerry introduced some 300 bills and he's passed five. (Oct 2004)
  • Iraqi war and tax cuts were not mistakes. (Oct 2004)
  • Free societies will be hopeful societies. (Sep 2004)
  • This young century will be liberty's century. (Sep 2004)
  • America will be more secure as freedom advances. (Sep 2004)
  • Screens all audiences to avoid hecklers. (Aug 2004)
  • Comforted mother Barbara at age 7 when his sister died. (Aug 2004)
  • IQ of 120 puts him above 90% of the population. (Aug 2004)
  • Member of secret society Skull and Bones & a fraternity guy. (Aug 2004)
  • Bush's smirk shows he's perturbed, not that he's arrogant. (Aug 2004)
  • Ad: Kerry missed votes in the Senate by campaigning. (Jul 2004)
  • John Dean: Bush impeachable if WMD info manipulated. (May 2004)
  • Bush elected as the un-Clinton. (Jun 2003)
  • Our grandest ideal: no insignificant person was ever born. (Jan 2001)
  • Citizenship is as important as government. (Jan 2001)
  • Favorites: PB&J, tacos, Winston Churchill, kissing Laura. (Sep 2000)
  • No need to excuse Cheney from energy issues. (Aug 2000)
  • Baseball is fun, politics is not. (Jun 2000)
  • Priorities: Reaganesque tax cuts; education & health reform. (Mar 2000)
  • Challenges the orthodoxy but is still a devout conservative. (Oct 1999)
  • Bush’s centrism: free trade; private IRAs; no new taxes. (Jul 1999)
  • Government can create an environment for prosperity. (Jun 1999)
  • Match conservative minds with compassionate hearts. (Jun 1999)

    Campaign Themes

  • Building a Safer, Stronger and Better America. (Aug 2004)
  • Calls on Americans to be citizens, not spectators. (Aug 2003)
  • "Compassionate conservatism" disliked by conservatives. (Jun 2003)
  • Communitarianism: Society over unfettered individualism. (Feb 2001)
  • Build a single nation of justice and opportunity. (Jan 2001)
  • Commitment to civility, courage, compassion and character. (Jan 2001)
  • End season of cynicism and politics of anger. (Nov 2000)
  • President should be a role model and uniter. (Nov 2000)
  • They have not led. We will. (Nov 2000)
  • Barnstorm for Reform: End D.C. cynicism & zero-sum politics. (Oct 2000)
  • Blueprint for the Middle Class: from birth thru retirement. (Sep 2000)
  • Real Plans for Real People: Bush promises honest talking. (Sep 2000)
  • Now is the time to do the hard things. (Aug 2000)
  • My generation tested limits; now we’re coming home. (Aug 2000)
  • Theme: change how Washington works & restore moral purpose. (Jun 2000)
  • Bush’s conservatism: local solutions within limited govt. (Dec 1999)
  • Government if necessary, not necessarily government. (Dec 1999)
  • “Compassionate conservatism” allows individual potential. (Mar 1999)
  • Prosperity with a purpose: Peaceful & prosperous future. (Mar 1999)

    Leadership Style

  • Cheerleader at Andover & Yale; as full of energy now. (Aug 2004)
  • John Dean: ending Bush's secrecy will avoid scandal. (May 2004)
  • Clarke: Bush admin uses war on terror for political gain. (Mar 2004)
  • Bush places personal loyalty over loyalty to the truth. (Jan 2004)
  • O'Neill: Bush is an ideologue, not a centrist. (Jan 2004)
  • Conspicuous intelligence unwelcome in Bush White House. (Jun 2003)
  • Reads people well; prefers one-on-one with legislators. (Oct 2000)
  • A leader has vision, credibility, and loyalty to friends. (Oct 2000)
  • End bickering in Washington to revive politics. (Oct 2000)
  • Put U.S. interests first and execute goals with good team. (Oct 2000)
  • The president must have credibility; Gore doesn’t. (Oct 2000)
  • Leads by building consensus, not by following polls. (Oct 2000)
  • Uphold law of the land & the dignity of the office. (Aug 2000)
  • Bush has “hands-off” style, says the test is good decisions. (Aug 2000)
  • Surrounded by smart people, but he decides himself. (Aug 2000)
  • Governs by outlining ideas & letting Legislature do details. (May 1999)

    Religion

  • Faith shapes his principles, which shape his policies. (Oct 2004)
  • Character determines your path; we are not the author. (Aug 2004)
  • Glad to sign a law "love thy neighbor". (Jun 2003)
  • Faith helps me in service to people. (Feb 2001)
  • US chosen by God to be a model among nations. (Aug 2000)
  • Jesus is part of my life; but won’t exclude non-Christians. (Jan 2000)
  • “A Charge to Keep,” hymn & painting, inspire Bush. (Dec 1999)
  • Charitable Choice has churches mentoring weflare clients. (Jun 1999)
  • Allow religious groups to address social ills. (Dec 1998)
  • Diminish role of govt as communities & churches take over. (Jul 1998)
  • Base “responsibility era” on Judeo-Christian values. (Apr 1998)
  • Religious affiliation: Methodist. (Nov 2000)
  • Member of National Governors Association. (Jan 2000)
George W. Bush on Social Security
Click here for 25 full quotes on Social Security OR 12 older headlines OR other candidates on Social Security OR background on Social Security.
  • Let young people use personal retirement savings accounts. (Oct 2004)
  • Social Security privatization will keep the system solvent. (Oct 2004)
  • Allow younger workers to put taxes in a personal account. (Sep 2004)
  • Personal retirement accounts for young workers. (Jan 2004)
  • Privatize SS while maintaining govt system. (Jan 2004)
  • Strengthen & modernize Social Security. (Aug 2003)
  • Create Individual Development Accounts with low-income match. (Aug 2003)
  • Ensure freedom of choice in retirement planning. (Aug 2003)
  • Minimize investment risk through diversification. (Aug 2003)
  • Strengthen women's retirement via catch up contributions. (Aug 2003)
  • Bush commission members all back privatization. (May 2001)
  • Forms presidential commission to reform Social Security. (Feb 2001)
  • Don’t treat Social Security like it’s a federal program. (Nov 2000)
  • Set aside $2.4T for seniors as well as younger workers. (Oct 2000)
  • Young workers want to invest some Social Security money. (Oct 2000)
  • Prohibit govt investment in the stock market, private OK. (Sep 2000)
  • Blueprint: Maintain retiree benefits; young get more options. (Sep 2000)
  • I will touch the third rail so I can fix it. (Aug 2000)
  • Open questions: transition costs & bad investors bailouts. (Jul 2000)
  • Maintain basics of government’s “most successful program”. (May 2000)
  • 2% real return is not enough; sound investments get 6%. (May 2000)
  • Support retirement via government-plus-private system. (May 2000)
  • Privatize Social Security to take advantage of stock market. (May 2000)
  • No government investment in private stocks or bonds. (Apr 2000)
  • Consider raising retirement age. (Nov 1999)
George W. Bush on Tax Reform
Click here for 44 full quotes on Tax Reform OR 37 older headlines OR other candidates on Tax Reform OR background on Tax Reform.
  • FactCheck: Kerry voted to increase taxes 39 times, not 98. (Oct 2004)
  • Now the tax code is fairer after the tax cut. (Oct 2004)
  • Kerry voted to increase taxes 98 times. (Oct 2004)
  • Will lead a bipartisan effort to simplify the tax code. (Sep 2004)
  • Congress must act to make tax cuts permanent. (Jan 2004)
  • Everyone benefits from dividend tax reform. (Aug 2003)
  • Reduction in dividend taxes benefits 35 million people. (Aug 2003)
  • Make the end of the death tax permanent. (Aug 2003)
  • People should not pay more in taxes than they do for food. (Nov 2000)
  • Be fair and eliminate death taxes for everyone. (Oct 2000)
  • Don’t eliminate gas tax; ask OPEC to increase supply. (Jul 2000)
  • Use the marketplace to encourage people to save and invest. (Apr 2000)
  • New Prosperity Initiative: 6 million tax-free families. (Apr 2000)
  • End death tax; reduce marriage penalty; more child credits. (Apr 2000)
  • 1997 no-tax pledge: judge results, despite breaking pledge. (Jan 2000)
  • $8B tax incentives for charitable contributions. (Jul 1999)
  • Read my tax pledge: No new taxes. (Jun 1999)
  • Simplify tax code to stimulate economic growth. (Apr 1999)

    Income Tax Cut

  • FactCheck: Most of Bush tax cut went to top 10%. (Oct 2004)
  • FactCheck: Wealthy pay 63% of taxes, not 80%. (Oct 2004)
  • Cut taxes on everybody. (Oct 2004)
  • Ad: The largest tax relief in history. (Jul 2004)
  • Tax relief is working. (Jan 2004)
  • Fact Check: Tax relief fueled spending, but not job growth. (Jan 2004)
  • Bush 2003 economic plan accelerates 2001 tax cuts. (Aug 2003)
  • Tax relief allows saving & spending more of your own money. (Aug 2003)
  • Deliver substantial tax relief to 91 million Americans. (Aug 2003)
  • Married with children -- taxes drop 96%. (Aug 2003)
  • Not too big, not too small, tax cut was just the right size. (Jun 2003)
  • On behalf of the American people, I’m asking for a refund. (Feb 2001)
  • Get bigger paychecks in people’s pockets fast. (Feb 2001)
  • Retroactive tax cuts may bolster faltering economy. (Jan 2001)
  • Claims lower income people benefit more than rich; untrue. (Oct 2000)
  • $500B to people earning under $100K; $800B to those richer. (Oct 2000)
  • Yes, wealthy get tax relief, but 6M poor will pay no tax. (Oct 2000)
  • Wealthy now pay 62% of all taxes; with his plan, 64%. (Oct 2000)
  • Claim that every taxpayer gets relief isn’t true. (Oct 2000)
  • All Americans deserve tax relief; no more “fuzzy numbers”. (Oct 2000)
  • More child & charity deductions in $1.3T tax cut. (Sep 2000)
  • Cut taxes on income, children, & inheritance. (Jun 2000)
  • More deductions for kids, education, charity, and marriage. (May 2000)
  • Reduce share of tax burden on low- and middle-income. (Apr 2000)
  • Tax cuts, so help me God. (Jan 2000)
  • No national sales tax or VAT. (Feb 2000)
George W. Bush on Technology
Click here for 12 full quotes on Technology OR 8 older headlines OR other candidates on Technology OR background on Technology.
  • Manned mission to